Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.03855

Mobile Supply: The Last Piece of Jigsaw of Recommender System

Zhenhao Jiang·Biao Zeng·Hao Feng·Jin Liu·Jie Zhang·Jia Jia·Ning Hu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recommendation system is a fundamental functionality of online platforms. With the development of computing power of mobile phones, some researchers have deployed recommendation algorithms on users' mobile devices to address the problems of data transmission delay and pagination trigger mechanism. However, the existing edge-side mobile rankings cannot completely solve the problem of pagination trigger mechanism. The mobile ranking can only sort the items on the current page, and the fixed set of candidate items limits the performance of the mobile ranking. Besides, after the user has viewed the items of interest to the user on the current page, the user refresh to get a new page of items. This will affect the user's immersive experience because the user is not satisfied with the left items on the current page. In order to address the problem of pagination trigger mechanism, we propose a completely new module in the pipeline of recommender system named Mobile Supply. The pipeline of recommender system is extended to "retrival->pre-ranking->ranking->re-ranking->Mobile Supply->mobile ranking". Specifically, we introduce the concept of list value and use point-wise paradigm to approximate list-wise estimation to calculate the maximum revenue that can be achieved by mobile ranking for the current page. We also design a new mobile ranking approach named device-aware mobile ranking considering the differences of mobile devices tailored to the new pipeline. Extensive offline and online experiments show the superiority of our proposed method and prove that Mobile Supply can further improve the performance of edge-side recommender system and user experience. Mobile Supply has been deployed on the homepage of a large-scale online food platform and has yielded considerable profits in our business.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhenhao Jiang, Biao Zeng, Hao Feng, Jin Liu, Jie Zhang, Jia Jia, Ning Hu. 2023-08-09. Mobile Supply: The Last Piece of Jigsaw of Recommender System. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03855

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Parameterized Dense-Sparse Fusion for Hybrid Retrieval: Tuning a Rank-Score Mix on BEIR SciFact with Qdrant

We study a parameterized hybrid ranker that fuses a dense embedding list and a sparse lexical list. The method has a small, explicit parameter vector: a dense prior $α\in [0,1]$, a score-versus-rank mix $λ\in [0,1]$, an RRF smoothing parameter $κ> 0$, optional list-geometry coefficients that move $α$ per query, and a router margin $τ$ that can turn sparse search off. We grid-search those ranges on SciFact train (809 queries) and freeze the chosen values on SciFact test (300). The tuned rank-score mix ($α= 0.8$, $λ= 0.75$, $κ= 20$) reaches 0.753 nDCG@10 and 0.889 recall@10, outperforming dense BGE (0.742 / 0.871) and equal-weight RRF (0.707 nDCG@10) on that test split. A list-conditioned $α$ adds +0.0006 nDCG; a sparse-off router is rejected by the same train split (any $τ$ that skipped approximately 50% of queries lost nDCG). These coefficients are dataset-specific. Equal RRF with the same models does not beat dense on a nine-zip BEIR macro-average (0.479 vs. 0.519 nDCG@10). Repeating the same train-then-freeze sweep independently on all 20 indexed units beats equal RRF on 20/20 and dense on 16/20 (unit-mean nDCG@10 0.467 vs. 0.462 dense vs. 0.420 RRF). Other corpora should reuse the ranges, not a copy of the SciFact point.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

From Ranked Documents to Reliable Contexts: An Answer-Oriented Context Construct Framework for AI Search

Traditional Web search follows a human-facing paradigm in which users inspect ranked documents and synthesize information themselves. In AI Search, retrieved documents instead serve as inputs to a generation model, shifting the retrieval objective from ranking documents by Search Satisfaction to constructing reliable context for correct answer generation. We formulate this shift as answer-oriented context construction through a three-stage framework: (1) Answer Support identifies candidate documents that contribute information to answer generation; (2) Content Trustworthiness assesses whether this information provides a reliable basis for correct answers from source, temporal, and factual perspectives; and (3) Context Organization selects, consolidates, and structures retained information under a finite context budget for consistent and robust generation. We further develop an industrial workflow spanning prior and posterior optimization and establish a systematic evaluation protocol covering both retrieval-side context and final answers. Experiments show consistent improvements at both Retrieval and Answer levels, demonstrating the effectiveness of the framework and its industrial implementation.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Robust Fusion of Semantic and Behavioural Signals for LLM Reranking in Personalised Search

Personalised search must satisfy query intent while incorporating user context and historical interactions. LLM-based cross-encoders provide a single reranking interface, but injecting predictive behavioural statistics into their prompts can encourage shortcut learning: reliance on historical signals at the expense of semantic and user-context patterns that generalise to sparse or unseen searches. We study this problem in the personalised search system of a large-scale audio streaming platform using Query Slice Stats (QSS), an interaction-derived behavioural feature summarising historical success for query-candidate pairs. Naive QSS injection improves ranking when the feature is available but reduces robustness when it is removed. We address this with deterministic dual-sample feature-dropout training, which presents each example once with QSS included and once with QSS removed. Offline, QSS injection improves ranking quality by 13.3% when available. Dual-sample training preserves these gains while improving performance under QSS-removed evaluation by 4.0% relative to naive QSS training. In a live online test, both QSS-aware variants improve search success by roughly 2%. The aggregate test does not distinguish dual-sample from features-only training; the cold-start comparison is directionally consistent with the offline results. Paired feature-present and feature-removed training can therefore reduce the tension between exploiting strong behavioural statistics and remaining robust when they are unavailable.

cs.IR↗