Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.06230

Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm

D. P. Aguillard·T. Albahri·D. Allspach·A. Anisenkov·K. Badgley·S. Baeßler·I. Bailey·L. Bailey·V. A. Baranov·E. Barlas-Yucel·T. Barrett·E. Barzi·F. Bedeschi·M. Berz·M. Bhattacharya·H. P. Binney·P. Bloom·J. Bono·E. Bottalico·T. Bowcock·S. Braun·M. Bressler·G. Cantatore·R. M. Carey·B. C. K. Casey·D. Cauz·R. Chakraborty·A. Chapelain·S. Chappa·S. Charity·C. Chen·M. Cheng·R. Chislett·Z. Chu·T. E. Chupp·C. Claessens·M. E. Convery·S. Corrodi·L. Cotrozzi·J. D. Crnkovic·S. Dabagov·P. T. Debevec·S. Di Falco·G. Di Sciascio·B. Drendel·A. Driutti·V. N. Duginov·M. Eads·A. Edmonds·J. Esquivel·M. Farooq·R. Fatemi·C. Ferrari·M. Fertl·A. T. Fienberg·A. Fioretti·D. Flay·S. B. Foster·H. Friedsam·N. S. Froemming·C. Gabbanini·I. Gaines·M. D. Galati·S. Ganguly·A. Garcia·J. George·L. K. Gibbons·A. Gioiosa·K. L. Giovanetti·P. Girotti·W. Gohn·L. Goodenough·T. Gorringe·J. Grange·S. Grant·F. Gray·S. Haciomeroglu·T. Halewood-Leagas·D. Hampai·F. Han·J. Hempstead·D. W. Hertzog·G. Hesketh·E. Hess·A. Hibbert·Z. Hodge·K. W. Hong·R. Hong·T. Hu·Y. Hu·M. Iacovacci·M. Incagli·P. Kammel·M. Kargiantoulakis·M. Karuza·J. Kaspar·D. Kawall·L. Kelton·A. Keshavarzi·D. S. Kessler
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, $\tildeω'^{}_p$, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, $ω_a$. From the ratio $ω_a / \tildeω'^{}_p$, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine $a_μ= 116\,592\,057(25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain $a_μ\text{(FNAL)} = 116\,592\,055(24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is $a_μ(\text{Exp}) = 116\,592\,059(22)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm), which represents a factor of 2 improvement in precision.

Explore related subjects

hep-ex

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D. P. Aguillard, T. Albahri, D. Allspach, A. Anisenkov, K. Badgley, S. Baeßler, I. Bailey, L. Bailey, V. A. Baranov, E. Barlas-Yucel, T. Barrett, E. Barzi, F. Bedeschi, M. Berz, M. Bhattacharya, H. P. Binney, P. Bloom, J. Bono, E. Bottalico, T. Bowcock, S. Braun, M. Bressler, G. Cantatore, R. M. Carey, B. C. K. Casey, D. Cauz, R. Chakraborty, A. Chapelain, S. Chappa, S. Charity, C. Chen, M. Cheng, R. Chislett, Z. Chu, T. E. Chupp, C. Claessens, M. E. Convery, S. Corrodi, L. Cotrozzi, J. D. Crnkovic, S. Dabagov, P. T. Debevec, S. Di Falco, G. Di Sciascio, B. Drendel, A. Driutti, V. N. Duginov, M. Eads, A. Edmonds, J. Esquivel, M. Farooq, R. Fatemi, C. Ferrari, M. Fertl, A. T. Fienberg, A. Fioretti, D. Flay, S. B. Foster, H. Friedsam, N. S. Froemming, C. Gabbanini, I. Gaines, M. D. Galati, S. Ganguly, A. Garcia, J. George, L. K. Gibbons, A. Gioiosa, K. L. Giovanetti, P. Girotti, W. Gohn, L. Goodenough, T. Gorringe, J. Grange, S. Grant, F. Gray, S. Haciomeroglu, T. Halewood-Leagas, D. Hampai, F. Han, J. Hempstead, D. W. Hertzog, G. Hesketh, E. Hess, A. Hibbert, Z. Hodge, K. W. Hong, R. Hong, T. Hu, Y. Hu, M. Iacovacci, M. Incagli, P. Kammel, M. Kargiantoulakis, M. Karuza, J. Kaspar, D. Kawall, L. Kelton, A. Keshavarzi, D. S. Kessler. 2023-10-04. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.131.161802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Production of Light Nuclei and Hypernuclei in Heavy-Ion Collisions

We review recent STAR and ALICE measurements of light-nucleus and hypernucleus yields, femtoscopic correlations, and collective flow presented at SQM 2026. Statistical-hadronization calculations provide a useful baseline for integrated yields but do not simultaneously describe all measured light-nucleus ratios across collision energies and system sizes. For bound states with mass number $A<4$, current coalescence calculations provide a broadly consistent description of yields, femtoscopic correlations, and collective flow, although the quantitative hypertriton comparison depends on the assumed few-body wave function. The suppressed production of resonant $^{4}$Li relative to compact $^{4}$He indicates an effect of nuclear structure and late-stage dynamics. However, the quantitative model comparison also depends on the treatment of feed-down from unstable states. In high-multiplicity $p$+$p$ collisions, pion-deuteron femtoscopy further indicates that most observed (anti)deuterons are formed through nucleon fusion after strong decays of short-lived resonances. Taken together, these measurements show that production chronology and internal nuclear structure leave measurable imprints on the physics observables.

hep-ex↗
arXiv2026

Search for the process $e^+e^-\to f_1(1285)$ at the SND detector

In the experiment with the SND detector at the VEPP-2000 $e^+e^-$ collider, a search is performed for the direct production of the $C$-even $f_1(1285)$ resonance in $e^+e^-$ collisions. The analysis is based on data with an integrated luminosity of about 200 pb$^{-1}$, accumulated in the center-of-mass energy range of 1.14--1.46 GeV, of which about 72 pb$^{-1}$ were recorded near the maximum of the $f_1(1285)$ resonance. The $f_1(1285)$ production cross section at the resonance maximum $\sigma(e^+e^-\to f_1)=(31\pm 13\pm 2)$ pb and the branching fraction $B(f_1(1285)\to e^+e^-)=(3.5\pm 1.4\pm 0.3)\times 10^{-9}$ have been measured. The significance of the observation of the $e^+e^-\to f_1(1285)$ process is $2.5\sigma$. Since the significance is low, we also present the upper limits at the 90% confidence level: $\sigma(e^+e^-\to f_1)<48\mbox{ pb}$ and $B(f_1(1285)\to e^+e^-)<5.4\times 10^{-9}$.

hep-ex↗
arXiv2026

Projected Sensitivity to Slow Muonphilic Dark Matter with Accelerator Muon Beams

The nature of dark matter (DM) remains one of the most enduring open questions in modern physics, and muonphilic DM has emerged as a promising scenario that complements traditional DM candidates. Following the recently established cosmic-ray muon scattering approach, we investigate the sensitivity for probing slow muonphilic DM with accelerator muon beams. A Geant4-based simulation framework is developed, incorporating the detector geometry from the PKMu muon tomography system and a dedicated elastic $\mu$-DM scattering process. The projected sensitivity is found to be largely insensitive to both the beam energy and the transverse beam size when the beam is fully contained within the detector acceptance. For a benchmark beam intensity of $10^5/\rm{s}$, the simulated pure-muon beam surpasses the existing cosmic-ray limit of $1.61\times10^{-17}$ cm$^2$ at $m_{\rm DM}=1$ GeV within approximately 11 seconds. A realistic muon beam phase-space distribution based on simulations for the High Intensity heavy-ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF) is also implemented, yielding projected limits that improve upon the cosmic-ray results by nearly two orders of magnitude in a one-day exposure. These results demonstrate that a beam-muon scattering experiment offers a robust and promising route toward significantly improved sensitivity to slow muonphilic DM.

hep-ex↗