Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2309.11102

On the connectivity of graph Lipscomb's space

Abstract

A central role in topological dimension theory is played by Lipscomb's space $J_{A}$ since it is a universal space for metric spaces of weight $|A|\geq \aleph _{0}$. On the one hand, Lipscomb's space is the attractor of a possibly infinite iterated function system, i.e. it is a generalized Hutchinson-Barnsley fractal. As, on the other hand, some classical fractal sets are universal spaces, one can conclude that there exists a strong connection between topological dimension theory and fractal set theory. A generalization of Lipscomb's space, using graphs, has been recently introduced (see R. Miculescu, A. Mihail, Graph Lipscomb's space is a generalized Hutchinson-Barnsley fractal, Aequat. Math., \textbf{96} (2022), 1141-1157). It is denoted by $J_{A}^{\G}$ and it is called graph Lipscomb's space associated with the graph $\G$ on the set $A$. It turns out that it is a topological copy of a generalized Hutchinson-Barnsley fractal. This paper provides a characterization of those graphs $\G$ for which $J_{A}^{\G}$ is connected. In the particular case when $A$ is finite, some supplementary characterizations are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W. Kubiś, R. Miculescu, A. Mihail, M. Nowak. 2023-09-20. On the connectivity of graph Lipscomb's space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sobriety of Scott topologies under countability conditions

In this paper, we focus on the sobriety of the Scott topology in countable case. Specifically, we show that: (1) every meet-continuous core-compact countable dcpo is sober with respect to the Scott topology; (2)every countable locally compact dcpo is sober endowed with the Scott topology; (3) the lattice of all open sets for the rational numbers space Q equipped with the Scott topology is not sober.

math.GN

Scott--Isbell Coincidence for Continuous Dcpos beyond Bicompleteness

Lawson and Mislove posed the following problem in 1990 as Problem~535 in \emph{Open Problems in Topology}: for a core-compact space \(X\) and a dcpo \(P\) equipped with its Scott topology, under what conditions on \(P\) do the Isbell and Scott topologies on \(C(X,P)\) agree?It was proved that, for a nonempty bicomplete continuous dcpo \(P\), the Isbell and Scott topologies on \(C(X,P)\) coincide for every core-compact space \(X\) if and only if \(P\) is bounded complete; for every compact core-compact space \(X\) if and only if \(P\) is conditionally bounded complete; and for every RW-space \(X\) if and only if \(P\) is a pointed continuous \(L\)-domain.We remove the bicompleteness assumption from all three classifications by combining the forbidden-retract theorem of Jia, Jung and Li with a separation theorem for powers of downward well-ordered chains and suitable Alexandrov test spaces.

math.GN

Three Problems on Separable Quotients of Precompact Abelian Groups

We address three problems on separable quotients of topological groups posed by Leiderman, Morris, and Tkachenko in \cite{LMT} published on Israel Journal of Mathematics. First, we construct in ZFC a connected Baire Pontryagin-reflexive dense subgroup of $\T^{\cc}$ whose countable subgroups are $h$-embedded and whose uncountable subgroups are dense. Its underlying abstract group is the circle group, and all its compact subsets are finite. Second, we construct a zero-dimensional Baire Pontryagin-reflexive example with the same subgroup properties whose underlying group is free abelian of rank $\cc$. Both examples have no nontrivial separable Hausdorff quotient. Third, for the group constructed in their Theorem~3.5, we determine every closed subgroup of every finite power up to an integral change of coordinates and prove that every countable subgroup of every Hausdorff quotient of a finite power is $h$-embedded and closed. The same conclusions hold for our free Baire reflexive example. These results answer Problem~1.25 negatively, Problem~3.12 affirmatively and realize all three regularity properties in Problem~3.14 simultaneously in \cite{LMT}.

math.GN