Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2312.01754

Derivation of a two-phase flow model accounting for surface tension

Abstract

This paper addresses the derivation of a two-phase flow model accounting for surface tension effects, by means of the Stationary Action Principle (SAP). The Lagrangian functional, defining the Action, is composed of a kinetic energy, accounting for interface feature, and a potential energy. The key element of the model lies on the assumption that the interface separating the two phases admits its own internal energy, satisfying a Gibbs form including both surface tension and interfacial area. Thus surface tension is taken into account both in the potential energy and the kinetic one which define the Lagrangian functional. Applying the SAP allows to build a set of partial differential equations modelling the dynamics of the two-phase flow. It includes evolution equations of the volume fraction and the interfacial area, accounting for mechanical relaxation terms. The final model is shown to be well posed (hyperbolicity, Lax entropy).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hélène Mathis. 2023-12-04. Derivation of a two-phase flow model accounting for surface tension. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01754

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A linear test approach to global controllability of third- and fifth-order nonlinear dispersive equations

We investigate third- and fifth-order nonlinear dispersive equations of KdV type on the torus and establishes approximate controllability by a fixed four-dimensional control; rather than relying solely on the saturation machinery, the analysis exploits the finite-dimensional controllability of the inviscid Burgers equation linearized around a carefully constructed return trajectory, with the trajectory itself obtained from an observable family. This ``linear test" strategy, yields more information about the structure of the control than the standard approach. In particular, the constructed control is shown to depend continuously on the initial and target states, a property that is by no means automatic in nonlinear control problems, and to decompose as a bounded linear operator applied to the data plus a fixed remainder, with the operator part interestingly independent of the order of dispersion.

math.AP

A conditional Lagrangian clock barrier at the $C^{1,\frac{1}{3}}$ threshold for axisymmetric Euler without swirl

We consider axisymmetric no-swirl solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, with initial velocity in $C^{1,α}\cap L^2$, where $α\in\left[\frac{1}{3},1\right)$. In a major breakthrough, Shkoller introduced a clock-and-driver framework that he used in order to prove finite-time type I blow-up below the $C^{1,\frac{1}{3}}$ threshold in this setting. Motivated by this, we define Lagrangian classes of coherent conditional solutions for which the same mechanism yields a supercritical-critical barrier to blow-up when $α\geq\frac{1}{3}$. When $α>\frac{1}{3}$, the aforementioned barrier is genuinely depleted, whereas at the critical endpoint $α=\frac{1}{3}$, we obtain an exponential bound preventing blow-up. In the general case, we formulate a matrix-clock criterion in terms of the smallest singular value of the deformation gradient and show that, under transverse cusp-tail, longitudinal, off-clock, Dini, and suitable geometric coherence hypotheses, this singular value cannot collapse in finite time. In particular, we also show that the class of such coherent solutions includes the smooth ones locally in time. In the on-axis case, the criterion reduces to the scalar clock inequality $\displaystyle \dot{J}(t)\gtrsim -B(t)J(t)-CJ(t)^{3α}$, which rules out Shkoller-type clock collapse for $α\geq\frac{1}{3}$. These results do not enlarge the known Lorentz-space global regularity classes. Rather, they in particular identify the supercritical Lagrangian obstruction dual to Shkoller's subcritical blow-up mechanism in the case $α>\frac{1}{3}$.

math.AP