Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2312.17095

Topologies of open complemented subsets

Abstract

We introduce cs-topologies, or topologies of open complemented subsets, as a new approach to constructive topology that preserves the duality between open and closed subsets of classical topology. Complemented subsets were used successfully by Bishop in his constructive formulation of the Daniell approach to measure and integration. Here we use complemented subsets in topology, in order to describe simultaneously an open set, the first-component of an open complemented subset, together with its given complement as a closed set, the second component of an open complemented subset. We analyse the canonical cs-topology induced by a metric, and we introduce the notion of a modulus of openness for a cs-open subset of a metric space. Pointwise and uniform continuity of functions between metric spaces are formulated with respect to the way these functions inverse open complemented subsets together with their moduli of openness. The addition of moduli of openness in the concept of a complemented open subset, given a base for the cs-topology, makes possible to define the notions of pointwise-like and uniform-like continuity of functions between csb-spaces, that is cs-spaces with a given base.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Iosif Petrakis. 2025-01-29. Topologies of open complemented subsets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17095

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sobriety of Scott topologies under countability conditions

In this paper, we focus on the sobriety of the Scott topology in countable case. Specifically, we show that: (1) every meet-continuous core-compact countable dcpo is sober with respect to the Scott topology; (2)every countable locally compact dcpo is sober endowed with the Scott topology; (3) the lattice of all open sets for the rational numbers space Q equipped with the Scott topology is not sober.

math.GN

Exponentiable Objects and Function spaces in Lowen Fuzzy Topological Spaces

We study exponentiable objects and function spaces in the category of stratified Lowen fuzzy topological spaces over \(\I=[0,1]\). Using the Lowen fuzzy Sierpiński object \(\Sier\), which identifies \(τ_X\) with \(C(X,\Sier)\), we explicitly determine the largest splitting topology on this mapping set. Its open weights \(Φ:τ_X\to\I\) are precisely those satisfying Scott continuity and a finite-tier compatibility condition induced by finite powers of \(\Sier\). This yields an intrinsic characterization: \(X\) is exponentiable if and only if every \(μ\inτ_X\) satisfies \[ μ=\bigvee_{λ\triangleleftΦ} (\const{Φ(μ)}\wedgeλ), \qquad λ\triangleleftΦ \Longleftrightarrow \const{Φ(ν)}\wedgeλ\leqν \quad(ν\inτ_X). \] When this condition holds, \(Y^X\) has underlying set \(C(X,Y)\), with topology generated by \([Φ,v](f)=Φ(v\circ f)\). We also obtain a dual closed-set formulation and three applications. Exponentiability implies that \(τ_X\) is a continuous lattice, although the converse fails. Moreover, a classical space \(X\) is exponentiable exactly when its induced fuzzy space \(ωX\) is exponentiable in the entire stratified Lowen category. Finally, Lowen compact, strongly fuzzy compact, and \(N\)-compact Hausdorff spaces are exponentiable.

math.GN

Super calibers in topological spaces and topological hyperspaces

We study the notion of a super caliber of a topological space, which is closely related to the classical notion of caliber and has appeared in the literature under several different names. We collect and unify several known results and establish new results concerning the collections of super calibers of topological spaces and their hyperspaces. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the super calibers of a space $X$ and those of hyperspaces $\mathcal{H}(X)$ lying between $\mathrm{CL}(X)$ and $\mathcal{F}(X)$. For infinite metrizable spaces, we characterize several cases in which $\mathsf{SC}(X)$ and $\mathsf{SC}(\mathrm{CL}(X))$ differ and establish an independence result over \textsf{ZFC}; see Theorem~5.12.

math.GN