Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2401.13179

Realized Stochastic Volatility Models with Skew-t Distributions for Volatility and Tail Risk Forecasting

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of volatility is essential for financial risk management and for the evaluation of tail risk measures such as value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). This study proposes the realized stochastic volatility (RSV) model, an extension of the traditional stochastic volatility (SV) model that incorporates realized volatility as an efficient proxy for latent volatility. To better capture the stylized features of financial return distributions, particularly skewness and heavy tails, we consider three variants of skew-t distributions, two of which also admit skew-normal components to flexibly model asymmetry. The models are estimated using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo approach and applied to daily returns and realized volatility measures for major U.S. and Japanese stock indices. Empirically, RSV models robustly improve volatility forecasts relative to SV models across both indices, all four realized volatility proxies, and both pairwise and joint evaluation procedures. The evidence on VaR and ES forecasts is more heterogeneous and the advantage of RSV and skew-t specifications over their SV counterparts is mixed. Across both volatility and tail risk forecasting, RSV and skew-t specifications are useful in several settings, but no single specification dominates uniformly across indices, risk levels, and sample periods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Makoto Takahashi, Yuta Yamauchi, Toshiaki Watanabe, Yasuhiro Omori. 2026-08-30. Realized Stochastic Volatility Models with Skew-t Distributions for Volatility and Tail Risk Forecasting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Evidence Aggregation for Treatment Choice

Consider a planner who has limited knowledge of the policy's causal impact on a certain local population of interest due to a lack of data, but does have access to the publicized intervention studies performed for similar policies on different populations. How should the planner make use of and aggregate this existing evidence to make her policy decision? Following Manski (2020; Towards Credible Patient-Centered Meta-Analysis, \textit{Epidemiology}), we formulate the planner's problem as a statistical decision problem with a social welfare objective, and solve for an optimal aggregation rule under the minimax-regret criterion. We investigate the analytical properties, computational feasibility, and welfare regret performance of this rule. We apply the minimax regret decision rule to decide whether to enact an active labor market policy based on 14 randomized control trial studies.

econ.EM

Beta-Sorted Portfolios

Beta-sorted portfolios---portfolios comprised of assets with similar covariation with selected risk factors---are a popular tool in empirical finance to analyze models of (conditional) expected returns. Despite their widespread use, little is known of their econometric properties in contrast to comparable procedures such as two-pass regressions. We formally investigate the properties of beta-sorted portfolio returns by casting the procedure as a two-step nonparametric estimator with a nonparametric first step and a beta-adaptive portfolio construction. Our framework rationalizes the well-known estimation algorithm with precise economic and statistical assumptions on the general data-generating process. We provide conditions which ensure valid estimation and inference allowing for a range of hypotheses of interest in financial applications. We show that the rate of convergence of the estimator changes depending on the value of beta. We demonstrate that valid inference depends critically on the object of interest and discuss drawbacks of the widely used Fama-MacBeth variance estimator. To address these limitations, we propose a new variance estimator. We demonstrate the usefulness of our theoretical results in two empirical applications, including one in which we introduce a novel risk factor that captures the business credit cycle and show that it predicts both the cross-sectional and time-series behavior of U.S. stock returns.

econ.EM

Difference-in-Differences with Unpoolable Data

Difference-in-differences (DID) is commonly used to estimate treatment effects but is infeasible in settings where data are unpoolable due to privacy concerns or legal restrictions on data sharing, particularly across jurisdictions. In this study, we identify and relax the assumption of data poolability in DID estimation. We propose an innovative approach to estimate DID with unpoolable data (UN-DID) which can accommodate covariates, multiple groups, and staggered adoption. Through analytical proofs and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that UN-DID and conventional DID estimates of the average treatment effect and standard errors are equal and unbiased in settings without covariates. With covariates, both methods produce estimates that are unbiased, equivalent, and converge to the true value. The estimates differ slightly but the statistical inference and substantive conclusions remain the same. Two empirical examples with real-world data further underscore UN-DID's utility. The UN-DID method allows the estimation of cross-jurisdictional treatment effects with unpoolable data, enabling better counterfactuals to be used and new research questions to be answered.

econ.EM