Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.03933

Development of a Evaluation Tool for Age-Appropriate Software in Aging Environments: A Delphi Study

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to develop a dependable reliable tool for assessing software ageappropriateness. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to get the indicators of technology ageappropriateness from studies from January 2000 to April 2023.This study engaged 25 experts from the fields of anthropology, sociology,and social technology research across, three rounds of Delphi consultations were conducted. Experts were asked to screen, assess, add and provide feedback on the preliminary indicators identified in the initial indicator pool. Result: We found 76 criterias for evaluating quality criteria was extracted, grouped into 11 distinct domains. After completing three rounds of Delphi consultations,experts drew upon their personal experiences,theoretical frameworks,and industry insights to arrive at a three-dimensional structure for the evaluation tooluser experience,product quality,and social promotion.These metrics were further distilled into a 16-item scale, and a corresponding questionnaire was formulated.The developed tool exhibited strong internal reliability(Cronbach's Alpha is 0.867)and content validity(S-CVI is 0.93). Conclusion: This tool represents a straightforward,objective,and reliable mechanism for evaluating software's appropriateness across age groups. Moreover,it offers valuable insights and practical guidance for designing and developing of high-quality age-appropriate software,and assisst age groups to select software they like.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhenggang Bai, Yougxiang Fang, Hongtu Chen, Xinru Chen, Ning An, Min Zhang, Guoxin Rui, Jing Jin. 2024-02-04. Development of a Evaluation Tool for Age-Appropriate Software in Aging Environments: A Delphi Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03933

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Search-based Trace Diagnostic for Cyber-Physical Systems

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) development requires verifying whether system behaviors violate their requirements. This analysis often considers system behaviors expressed by execution traces and requirements expressed by signal-based temporal properties. When an execution trace violates a requirement, engineers must solve the trace diagnostic problem---they need to understand the cause of the breach. Automated trace diagnostic techniques aim to support engineers in the trace diagnostic activity. This paper proposes search-based trace diagnostic (SBTD), a novel trace diagnostic technique for CPS requirements. Unlike existing techniques, SBTD relies on evolutionary search. SBTD starts from a set of candidate diagnoses, applies an evolutionary algorithm to generate new candidate diagnoses (via mutation, recombination, and selection), and uses a fitness function to determine the qualities of these solutions. Then, a diagnostic generator step is performed to explain the cause of the trace violation. We implemented Diagnosis, an SBTD tool for signal-based temporal logic requirements expressed using the Hybrid Logic of Signals (HLS). We evaluated Diagnosis by performing 34 experiments for 17 trace-requirement combinations for property violations. We assessed the effectiveness of SBTD in producing informative diagnoses and its efficiency. Diagnosis achieved expert-aligned diagnoses for 29/34 experiments and scaled to the full HLS benchmark, whereas state-of-the-art literature remained restricted to a subset due to performance and language limitations. SBTD treats trace-checking as a black box, which makes the checker replaceable. Substituting our HLS checker for an STL monitor, e.g., RTAMT, reproduces on two requirements the diagnoses at two to three orders of magnitude lower per-check cost.

cs.SE

Toward Secure Code Generation: Bridging Correctness and Security via Task-Adaptive Vulnerability Modeling and Execution-Based Benchmarking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for program synthesis, yet they often generate code that is functionally plausible but insecure. Progress in secure code generation has been hindered by benchmarks that are small, non-executable, leak mitigation details, or rely on noisy analyzers and subjective judgments, making it difficult to measure whether security improves without sacrificing correctness. We address these gaps with CodeSecEval, an execution-based benchmark for secure code generation, comprising 255 Python tasks spanning 77 CWE categories. Each task provides paired insecure and secure implementations together with executable functional and vulnerability-targeted security tests, enabling precise and reproducible evaluation of secure code generation and insecure-code repair. Building on CodeSecEval, we propose SecAwareCoder, an agent-based framework that shifts code generation toward secure-by-construction synthesis. SecAwareCoder performs task-adaptive threat modeling to identify security-sensitive regions and derive task-grounded vulnerability hypotheses, uses these hypotheses to guide both constraint-aware code generation and security-aware test synthesis, and leverages execution feedback for targeted refinement. Experiments across multiple LLM backbones show that SecAwareCoder consistently improves Pass@1 and security robustness over prompting and analyzer-driven baselines, narrowing the security--correctness gap in LLM code generation.

cs.SE

Enabling Communication via APIs for Mainframe Applications

Mainframe systems continue to support critical applications across industries such as banking, retail, and healthcare. Exposing their functionality through Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) enables reuse and development of new applications, but identifying and implementing APIs for legacy code remains challenging. It requires understanding complex programs, separating dependent components, introducing new artifacts, and preserving functionality and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) such as Turnaround Time (TAT). We propose a framework for APIfication of legacy mainframe applications. Candidate APIs are identified from artifacts such as transactions, screens, control-flow blocks, inter-microservice calls, business rules, and data accesses. Static analyses, including liveness and reaching definitions, are then used to traverse the code and automatically compute API signatures consisting of request and response fields. We evaluated the framework through a qualitative survey of nine mainframe developers with an average of 15 years of experience, using the public GENAPP application and two industrial mainframe applications. The results show that the framework identifies additional candidate APIs and reduces implementation effort for APIfication. The API-signature computation has been incorporated into IBM watsonx Code Assistant for Z Refactoring Assistant. We further validated the identified APIs by executing them on an IBM Z mainframe system, demonstrating the practical viability of the approach.

cs.SE