Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.04466

Towards Deterministic End-to-end Latency for Medical AI Systems in NVIDIA Holoscan

Abstract

The introduction of AI and ML technologies into medical devices has revolutionized healthcare diagnostics and treatments. Medical device manufacturers are keen to maximize the advantages afforded by AI and ML by consolidating multiple applications onto a single platform. However, concurrent execution of several AI applications, each with its own visualization components, leads to unpredictable end-to-end latency, primarily due to GPU resource contentions. To mitigate this, manufacturers typically deploy separate workstations for distinct AI applications, thereby increasing financial, energy, and maintenance costs. This paper addresses these challenges within the context of NVIDIA's Holoscan platform, a real-time AI system for streaming sensor data and images. We propose a system design optimized for heterogeneous GPU workloads, encompassing both compute and graphics tasks. Our design leverages CUDA MPS for spatial partitioning of compute workloads and isolates compute and graphics processing onto separate GPUs. We demonstrate significant performance improvements across various end-to-end latency determinism metrics through empirical evaluation with real-world Holoscan medical device applications. For instance, the proposed design reduces maximum latency by 21-30% and improves latency distribution flatness by 17-25% for up to five concurrent endoscopy tool tracking AI applications, compared to a single-GPU baseline. Against a default multi-GPU setup, our optimizations decrease maximum latency by 35% for up to six concurrent applications by improving GPU utilization by 42%. This paper provides clear design insights for AI applications in the edge-computing domain including medical systems, where performance predictability of concurrent and heterogeneous GPU workloads is a critical requirement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Soham Sinha, Shekhar Dwivedi, Mahdi Azizian. 2024-02-06. Towards Deterministic End-to-end Latency for Medical AI Systems in NVIDIA Holoscan. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04466

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks

Vibe coding is a new software development paradigm in which human engineers prompt a large language model (LLM) agent to complete complex coding tasks with little supervision. Although vibe coding is increasingly adopted, is the generated code really safe to deploy in production? To investigate this question, we propose SUSVIBES, a benchmark consisting of 186 feature-request software engineering tasks from real-world open-source projects, for which, human programmers committed vulnerable implementations. We evaluate 12 widely used coding agentic settings with frontier models on the benchmark. Disturbingly, all agents perform poorly in terms of software security. Although 57% of the solutions from SWE-Agent with Claude 4 Sonnet are functionally correct, only 11.8% are secure. Further experiments demonstrate that preliminary security strategies, such as augmenting the feature request with vulnerability hints, cannot mitigate these security issues. Our findings raise serious concerns about the widespread adoption of vibe coding, particularly in security-sensitive applications. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/LeiLiLab/susvibes. The leaderboard is at https://leililab.github.io/susvibes-leaderboard.

cs.SE

Why3-py: A Tool for Formal Verification of Hypothesis Testing and Meta-Analysis in Python

The reproducibility crisis in scientific research has received widespread recognition, thereby increasing the importance of meta-analyses that integrate statistical analyses from multiple studies. However, statistical methods often have ambiguous and implicit underlying assumptions, which can lead to their erroneous applications and interpretations. To address this issue, we propose a formal verification framework for statistical Python programs. Specifically, we present Why3-py, a Python front-end for the Why3 verification platform that transforms Python code into verification-oriented WhyML representations, addressing the challenges arising from Python's dynamic typing and runtime polymorphism. Furthermore, we extend the StatWhy tool to support the verification of meta-analysis methods. These tools enable meta-analysts to identify overlooked assumptions and misuse of analyses, and to verify the correct use of hypothesis testing and meta-analysis methods in Python code.

cs.SE

What is the Difference Between Me and You? Benchmarking the Quality Gap Between Human-Written and AI-Generated Code

AI coding assistants are becoming co-authors of production software, yet their evaluation centers on functional correctness, leaving open whether their code differs from human code in the quality dimensions dominating lifecycle cost. We compare human-written and AI-generated code at scale: 787,562 function pairs across Python, Java, and C, each human function mined from open-source repositories paired with implementations generated from its docstring by three AI assistants (OpenAI GPT models, DeepSeek-Coder, Qwen2.5-Coder). We characterize structural complexity and statistical naturalness, and map static-analysis findings onto Orthogonal Defect Classification for defects and the Common Weakness Enumeration for vulnerabilities, making authors and languages directly comparable. AI-generated code is structurally compressed and stylistically templated: roughly half the size and branching of human code, clustering apart at the style level. Defect profiles differ in kind: human code concentrates issues of mature codebases, AI code repetitive boilerplate; security is language-dependent, with LLMs producing more, and more severe, findings in Python and Java but fewer high-severity memory-safety findings than humans in C. Once size is controlled for, complexity metrics carry little signal, while naturalness separates authors. Finally, we release CQBench, a benchmark of 27,346 issue-prone tasks with baselines and an evaluation pipeline for quality assurance and security testing.

cs.SE