Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2403.05592

Eternal Sunshine of the Mechanical Mind: The Irreconcilability of Machine Learning and the Right to be Forgotten

Abstract

As we keep rapidly advancing toward an era where artificial intelligence is a constant and normative experience for most of us, we must also be aware of what this vision and this progress entail. By first approximating neural connections and activities in computer circuits and then creating more and more sophisticated versions of this crude approximation, we are now facing an age to come where modern deep learning-based artificial intelligence systems can rightly be called thinking machines, and they are sometimes even lauded for their emergent behavior and black-box approaches. But as we create more powerful electronic brains, with billions of neural connections and parameters, can we guarantee that these mammoths built of artificial neurons will be able to forget the data that we store in them? If they are at some level like a brain, can the right to be forgotten still be protected while dealing with these AIs? The essential gap between machine learning and the RTBF is explored in this article, with a premonition of far-reaching conclusions if the gap is not bridged or reconciled any time soon. The core argument is that deep learning models, due to their structure and size, cannot be expected to forget or delete a data as it would be expected from a tabular database, and they should be treated more like a mechanical brain, albeit still in development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meem Arafat Manab. 2024-03-06. Eternal Sunshine of the Mechanical Mind: The Irreconcilability of Machine Learning and the Right to be Forgotten. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Mathematical Evolution of Addressing: From Yushchenko's Address Programming Language to A Mathematics of Arrays How Addressing Evolved into a Mathematical Theory of Indexing, Array Computation, and Machine Realization

This article argues that a central development in the history of computing is the mathematical evolution of addressing. During the three decades separating Kateryna Yushchenko's Address Programming Language (1958) from Lenore Mullin's A Mathematics of Arrays (1988), addressing evolved from a machine-level mechanism for locating data into a formal theory of indexing, reduction, and machine realization, passing through Kenneth Iverson's algebra of arrays and Philip Abrams' recognition of shape as an architectural resource. Mullin's theory establishes indexing itself, via the function ψ, as the primitive from which array operations compose, reduce to a Denotational Normal Form, transform into an Operational Normal Form, and realize on hardware through dimension lifting. Historical claims are sourced against primary material, with inferences flagged as such; mathematical claims are stated as identities; performance claims are marked validated, theoretically established, or provisional. The result links programming languages, array mathematics, and computer architecture in one account.

cs.GL

The Theorems of Dr. David Blackwell and Their Contributions to Artificial Intelligence

Dr. David Blackwell was a mathematician and statistician of the first rank, whose contributions to statistical theory, game theory, and decision theory predated many of the algorithmic breakthroughs that define modern artificial intelligence. This survey examines three of his most consequential theoretical results the Rao Blackwell theorem, the Blackwell Approachability theorem, and the Blackwell Informativeness theorem (comparison of experiments) and traces their direct influence on contemporary AI and machine learning. We show that these results, developed primarily in the 1940s and 1950s, remain technically live across modern subfields including Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference, autonomous mobile robot navigation (SLAM), generative model training, no-regret online learning, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), large language model alignment, and information design. NVIDIAs 2024 decision to name their flagship GPU architecture (Blackwell) provides vivid testament to his enduring relevance. We also document an emerging frontier: explicit Rao Blackwellized variance reduction in LLM RLHF pipelines, recently proposed but not yet standard practice. Together, Blackwell theorems form a unified framework addressing information compression, sequential decision making under uncertainty, and the comparison of information sources precisely the problems at the core of modern AI.

cs.GL

The Reconstructions of Konrad Zuse's Z3 Computer

This paper reviews the various reconstructions of Konrad Zuse's Z3 computer, built in 1941. The first is the reconstruction made by Zuse himself in the 1960s, which is now housed at the Deutsches Museum in Munich. Second is the 2001 reconstruction, made in Berlin, and which has a didactic purpose. Third is the Z3r, a Z3 reconstruction built by Horst Zuse in honor of his father's 100th birthday. Fourth is the reconstruction by Christoph Traber in Switzerland. All of these machines strive to preserve the cultural heritage that the Z3 represents.

cs.GL