Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.02912

Probabilistic Generating Circuits -- Demystified

Sanyam Agarwal·Markus Bläser
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Zhang et al. (ICML 2021, PLMR 139, pp. 12447-1245) introduced probabilistic generating circuits (PGCs) as a probabilistic model to unify probabilistic circuits (PCs) and determinantal point processes (DPPs). At a first glance, PGCs store a distribution in a very different way, they compute the probability generating polynomial instead of the probability mass function and it seems that this is the main reason why PGCs are more powerful than PCs or DPPs. However, PGCs also allow for negative weights, whereas classical PCs assume that all weights are nonnegative. One of the main insights of our paper is that the negative weights are responsible for the power of PGCs and not the different representation. PGCs are PCs in disguise, in particular, we show how to transform any PGC into a PC with negative weights with only polynomial blowup. PGCs were defined by Zhang et al. only for binary random variables. As our second main result, we show that there is a good reason for this: we prove that PGCs for categorial variables with larger image size do not support tractable marginalization unless NP = P. On the other hand, we show that we can model categorial variables with larger image size as PC with negative weights computing set-multilinear polynomials. These allow for tractable marginalization. In this sense, PCs with negative weights strictly subsume PGCs.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sanyam Agarwal, Markus Bläser. 2024-03-04. Probabilistic Generating Circuits -- Demystified. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02912

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Counting Small Induced Subgraphs: Hardness of Symmetry-Based Properties

Jerrum and Meeks (TOCT, JCSS 2015) introduced the counting problems $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ for fixed graph properties $Φ$: Given an input graph $G$ and $k\in\mathbb N$, count the $k$-vertex subsets $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that the induced subgraph $G[S]$ satisfies $Φ$. For recursively enumerable $Φ$, it is known that $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ is either #W[1]-hard or fixed-parameter tractable. A direct classification depending on $Φ$ however still remains open. In particular, the status was open for the property of graphs without nontrivial automorphisms, also mentioned in a very recent survey on parameterized counting by Roth (Comput.~Sci.~Rev.~2026). This is a natural property that evades all currently known techniques for proving #W[1]-hardness, including a general toolkit based on Fourier analysis that was very recently introduced by Curticapean and Neuen (SODA~2025). In this paper, we show that counting induced $k$-vertex graphs without nontrivial automorphisms is #W[1]-hard by constructing ``clique scaffolds'', i.e., problem-specific restrictions of the property that enable a reduction from the $k$-clique problem. More generally, we show that for every finite group $Q$, counting $k$-vertex induced subgraphs with automorphism group $Q$ is #W[1]-hard.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Improved Algorithms for the Remote Point Problem

The Remote Point Problem (RPP) is an algorithmic problem that asks, given a linear subspace $L \subseteq \mathbb{F}^n$ of dimension $k$, to deterministically find a vector $v \in \mathbb{F}^n$ far in Hamming distance from $L$. This problem was introduced by Alon, Panigrahy and Yekhanin [APY09], motivated in part by the matrix rigidity approach for proving circuit lower bounds. An algorithm is said to achieve remoteness $d$ if it finds a vector $v$ whose Hamming distance from $L$ is at least $d$. We observe that over the rational numbers, the problem admits a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that achieves optimal remoteness $n-k$. Over finite fields, we obtain a (modest) improvement of a result of Alon, Panigrahy and Yekhanin [APY09], and give an algorithm that achieves remoteness $Ω\left(\frac{n}{\max\{k, \log n\}} \log n\right)$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Strong Selective and List-Decoding Direct Product Theorems for Quantum Query Complexity

Quantum strong direct-product theorems for specific functions have been known for nearly two decades. These have been extended to general results for function computation and state generation. The proofs of these results use a version of the multiplicative adversary method that does not naturally extend to relations. Standard strong direct-product theorems apply when algorithms must correctly answer every given question. Prior work extended them to equivalent threshold direct-product theorems, which require answers to all questions but only require that most answers are correct. We focus on two further generalizations. Strong selective direct-products apply to algorithms that adaptively choose, based on what they learn from queries, which questions from a large list to answer. This generalization is relational and useful for proving time-space tradeoffs. We prove a quantum strong selective direct-product theorem for all functions using a new multiplicative adversary formulation for relations that satisfies a strong selective direct product property while being strong enough to capture any query lower bound for functions proven by negative-weights adversaries. This was not previously known even without selectivity. The second generalization is list-decoding direct product problems introduced by Ben-David and Blais for classical randomized query complexity. These allow an algorithm to produce a large list of possible output vectors such that one of them is fully correct. They proved that such theorems hold for classical randomized complexity of all Boolean functions. We prove a quantum analogue of this theorem for all partial Boolean functions. We show that strong list-decoding direct-product theorems are implied by a special case of multiplicative adversaries which we show, via a new reduction, can be obtained from negative-weights adversaries for any Boolean-valued function.

cs.CC↗