Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2405.02990

Raney extensions: a pointfree theory of T_0 spaces based on canonical extension

Abstract

We introduce a pointfree version of Raney duality. Our objects are \emph{Raney extensions} of frames, pairs $(L,C)$ where $C$ is a coframe and $L\subseteq C$ is a subframe that meet-generates it and whose embedding preserves strongly exact meets. We show that there is a dual adjunction between $\mathbf{Raney}$ and $\mathbf{Top}$, with all $T_0$ spaces as fixpoints, assigning to a space $X$ the pair $(Ω(X),\mathcal{U}(X))$, with $\mathcal{U}(X)$ are the intersections of open sets. We show that for every Raney extension $(L,C)$ there are subcolocale inclusions $\mathcal{S}_c(L)^{op}\subseteq C\subseteq \mathcal{S}_o(L)$ where these are the opposite of the frame of joins of closed sublocales and the coframe of intersections of open sublocales. We thus exhibit a symmetry between these two well-studied structures in pointfree topology. The spectra of these are, respectively, the classical spectrum $\mathsf{pt}(L)$ of the underlying frame and its $T_D$ spectrum $\mathsf{pt}_D(L)$. This confirms the view advanced in \cite{banaschewskitd} that sobriety and the $T_D$ property are mirror images of each other, and suggests that the symmetry above is a pointfree view of it. All Raney extensions satisfy some variation of the properties \emph{density} and \emph{compactness} from the theory of canonical extensions. We characterize sobriety, the $T_1$, and the $T_D$ axioms in terms of density and compactness of $(Ω(X),\mathcal{U}(X))$. We characterize frame morphisms $f:L\to M$ that extend to Raney morphisms $\overline{f}:(L,C)\to (M,D)$. We use this result to exhibit the existence of various free and cofree constructions. We use Raney extensions to give a new perspective on canonical extension generalized to frames as well as $T_D$ duality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Laura Suarez. 2025-04-22. Raney extensions: a pointfree theory of T_0 spaces based on canonical extension. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02990

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Categorical Generalization of Counterpoint

We extend Mazzola's counterpoint model using category theory, generalizing from the category $\mathbf{Set}$ to an arbitrary topos other than $\mathbf{Set}$. This generalization suggests that counterpoint's essential structure depends on specific categorical conditions rather than classical set-theoretic reasoning. A key contribution is identifying sufficient requirements for a well-behaved counterpoint theory in a topos: some version of Zorn's Lemma (GJZL), and two-valuedness and split supports (NS). Within a topos, we introduce (weak) quasidichotomies alongside the classical notion of dichotomy. These structures capture varying degrees of oppositional structure between consonance and dissonance, with weak quasidichotomies preserving the non-Boolean flexibility essential to musical practice while quasidichotomies represent maximal opposition short of complete partition. We prove a generalized counterpoint theorem giving sufficient conditions for the existence of admitted successors. When the ambient topos turns non-zero successor objects into points, admitted succession can be iterated to form counterpoint paths, which may terminate at consonances with no admitted successor. The framework naturally accommodates counterpoint with sets instead of pure pitches, relaxing the ``yes/no'' character of classical consonance definitions and emphasizing context-dependence. Mazzola's model allows a Kuratowski closure operator induced by a polarity, which defines an internal topology enabling algebraic-topological analysis of counterpoint structure. We conclude by showing this construction generalizes to involutive morphisms. This categorical approach provides foundations for understanding both the historical evolution of contrapuntal practice and cross-cultural divergences in interval organization.

math.CT

From 3-crossed modules to Gray-type 4-categories

In this paper, we investigate the relation between the category of 3-crossed modules and the category of Gray-type 4-groups. The notion of a 3-crossed module was first introduced by Arvasi \textit{et al.}, motivated by the question of what kind of algebraic structure completely encodes a homotopy 4-type. On the other hand, from the point of view that higher groups are equivalent to algebraic realizations of higher categories -- as exemplified by the relationship between 2-crossed modules and Gray 3-groups established by Sarikaya--Ulualan -- it had not been clear how the 3-crossed modules of Arvasi \textit{et al.} relate to any higher category. In our previous paper, we proposed a new definition of a 3-crossed module and observed that it admits a natural interpretation in terms of higher categories. In this paper, we make this interpretation precise: we introduce a 4-category, which reduces to a semistrict braided monoidal 2-category when restricted to a single object and a single 1-morphism, and prove that the category of our 3-crossed modules is equivalent to the category of Gray 4-groups, defined as single-object versions of this 4-category in which all morphisms are invertible. We therefore expect that these structures can correctly capture the topological nature of surface knots and higher-dimensional manifolds.

math.CT

Observations on the variety of equationally linear Heyting semilattices

In previous work, we analysed a number of categorical properties, of interest in the context of Janelidze-Márki-Tholen semi-abelian categories, for the variety $\mathsf{HSLat}$ of Heyting semilattices. In this paper, we focus on the subvariety $\mathsf{ELHSLat}$ of equationally linear Heyting semilattices. Our main objective is to show that, unlike $\mathsf{HSLat}$, this category is algebraically coherent. We furthermore prove that it is neither locally algebraically cartesian closed nor cosmash associative.

math.CT