Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2405.08289

Exploring Equilibrium Strategies in Network Games with Generative AI

Abstract

Game theory offers a powerful framework for analyzing strategic interactions among decision-makers, providing tools to model, analyze, and predict their behavior. However, implementing game theory can be challenging due to difficulties in deriving solutions, understanding interactions, and ensuring optimal performance. Traditional non-AI and discriminative AI approaches have made valuable contributions but struggle with limitations in handling large-scale games and dynamic scenarios. In this context, generative AI emerges as a promising solution because of its superior data analysis and generation capabilities. This paper comprehensively summarizes the challenges, solutions, and outlooks of combining generative AI with game theory. We start with reviewing the limitations of traditional non-AI and discriminative AI approaches in employing game theory, and then highlight the necessity and advantages of integrating generative AI. Next, we explore the applications of generative AI in various stages of the game theory lifecycle, including model formulation, solution derivation, and strategy improvement. Additionally, from game theory viewpoint, we propose a generative AI-enabled framework for optimizing machine learning model performance against false data injection attacks, supported by a case study to demonstrate its effectiveness. Finally, we outline future research directions for generative AI-enabled game theory, paving the way for its further advancements and development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yaoqi Yang, Hongyang Du, Geng Sun, Zehui Xiong, Dusit Niyato, Zhu Han. 2024-05-14. Exploring Equilibrium Strategies in Network Games with Generative AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT