Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2406.15358

Introducing Syllable Tokenization for Low-resource Languages: A Case Study with Swahili

Abstract

Many attempts have been made in multilingual NLP to ensure that pre-trained language models, such as mBERT or GPT2 get better and become applicable to low-resource languages. To achieve multilingualism for pre-trained language models (PLMs), we need techniques to create word embeddings that capture the linguistic characteristics of any language. Tokenization is one such technique because it allows for the words to be split based on characters or subwords, creating word embeddings that best represent the structure of the language. Creating such word embeddings is essential to applying PLMs to other languages where the model was not trained, enabling multilingual NLP. However, most PLMs use generic tokenization methods like BPE, wordpiece, or unigram which may not suit specific languages. We hypothesize that tokenization based on syllables within the input text, which we call syllable tokenization, should facilitate the development of syllable-aware language models. The syllable-aware language models make it possible to apply PLMs to languages that are rich in syllables, for instance, Swahili. Previous works introduced subword tokenization. Our work extends such efforts. Notably, we propose a syllable tokenizer and adopt an experiment-centric approach to validate the proposed tokenizer based on the Swahili language. We conducted text-generation experiments with GPT2 to evaluate the effectiveness of the syllable tokenizer. Our results show that the proposed syllable tokenizer generates syllable embeddings that effectively represent the Swahili language.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jesse Atuhurra, Hiroyuki Shindo, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe. 2024-03-26. Introducing Syllable Tokenization for Low-resource Languages: A Case Study with Swahili. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15358

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SafetyFlow: An Agent-Flow System for Automated LLM Safety Benchmarking

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has intensified the requirement for reliable safety evaluation to uncover model vulnerabilities. To this end, numerous LLM safety evaluation benchmarks are proposed. However, existing benchmarks generally rely on labor-intensive manual curation, which causes excessive time and resource consumption. They also exhibit significant redundancy and limited difficulty. To alleviate these problems, we introduce SafetyFlow, the first agent-flow system designed to automate the construction of LLM safety benchmarks. SafetyFlow can automatically build a comprehensive safety benchmark in only four days without any human intervention by orchestrating seven specialized agents, significantly reducing time and resource cost. Equipped with versatile tools, the agents of SafetyFlow ensure process and cost controllability while integrating human expertise into the automatic pipeline. The final constructed dataset, SafetyFlowBench, contains 23,446 queries with low redundancy and strong discriminative power. Our contribution includes the first fully automated benchmarking pipeline and a comprehensive safety benchmark. We evaluate the safety of 49 advanced LLMs on our dataset and conduct extensive experiments to validate our efficacy and efficiency.

cs.CL

Geometric Uncertainty for Detecting and Correcting Hallucinations in LLMs

Large language models are known to hallucinate, generating linguistically plausible but incorrect answers to questions. Uncertainty quantification has been proposed as a strategy to detect such behaviour, but existing methods lack a unified framework to assess reliability at both the prompt and answer level. We introduce a geometric framework which quantifies language model uncertainty at both levels by explicitly modelling a prompt-conditioned semantic distribution in answer embedding space. Our approach is black-box and sampling-based; we generate multiple answers per prompt, and use archetypal analysis to estimate a geometric support for the answer distribution. At the prompt level, we approximate the distribution entropy to quantify uncertainty; for each individual answer, we then use notions of atypicality to assess its reliability relative to the batch. We employ our framework to not only detect hallucinations but correct them, by selecting the batch example deemed most reliable. Experiments show that our framework performs comparably to or better than prior methods on short form question-answering datasets, and achieves superior results on medical datasets where hallucinations carry particularly critical risks. Beyond pure performance, we suggest the theoretical grounding of our work provides support for semantic distributions as useful objects of study for language model uncertainty.

cs.CL

Calibrated Confidence Expression for Radiology Report Generation

Safe deployment of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in radiology report generation requires not only accurate predictions but also clinically interpretable indicators of when outputs should be thoroughly reviewed, enabling selective radiologist verification and reducing the risk of hallucinated findings influencing clinical decisions. One intuitive approach to this is verbalized confidence, where the model explicitly states its certainty. However, current state-of-the-art language models are often overconfident, and research on calibration in multimodal settings such as radiology report generation is limited. To address this gap, we introduce ConRad (Confidence Calibration for Radiology Reports), a reinforcement learning framework for fine-tuning medical LVLMs to produce calibrated verbalized confidence estimates alongside radiology reports. We study two settings: a single report-level confidence score and a sentence-level variant assigning a confidence to each claim. Both are trained using the GRPO algorithm with reward functions based on the logarithmic scoring rule, which incentivizes truthful self-assessment by penalizing miscalibration and guarantees optimal calibration under reward maximization. Experimentally, ConRad substantially improves calibration and outperforms competing methods. In a clinical evaluation we show that ConRad's report level scores are well aligned with clinicians' judgment. By highlighting full reports or low-confidence statements for targeted review, ConRad can support safer clinical integration of AI-assistance for report generation.

cs.CL