Multi-Agent Causal Discovery Using Large Language Models

Abstract

Causal discovery aims to identify causal relationships between variables and is a fundamental problem across the sciences. Traditional statistical causal discovery (SCD) methods rely solely on observational data and ignore the contextual information available in metadata, whereas recent LLM-based methods exploit metadata but treat the large language model (LLM) as a single agent, leaving its judgments vulnerable to memorized or biased associations. To address this gap, we introduce MAC (Multi-Agent Causal Discovery Framework), which casts causal discovery as a multi-agent debate coupled with the autonomous selection of an SCD algorithm. MAC combines two complementary modules, bridged by a Meta Fusion mechanism: a Debate-Coding Module (DCM) that grounds an initial graph in data by autonomously selecting and executing the best-suited SCD algorithm, and a Meta-Debate Module (MDM) that refines the graph through an adversarial Affirmative-Negative-Judge debate over the metadata. Across five benchmark datasets and three metrics (F1, SHD, NHD), MAC achieves the best aggregate performance among five statistical and four LLM-based baselines, ranking first on 10 of 15 evaluation points with Gemini-2.0-Flash -- including a perfect reconstruction of the Earthquake graph -- and remains robust across three backbone LLMs.