Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.12577

Microtransit revenue management informed by citywide travel demand and joint subscription-mode choice modeling

Abstract

As an IT-enabled multi-passenger mobility service, microtransit can improve accessibility, reduce congestion, and promote sustainability. However, realizing its business potential requires a deeper understanding of traveler preferences, highlighting the need for more effective tools for demand forecasting and revenue management, especially when actual usage data are limited. We propose an innovative modeling approach that integrates travel behavioral insights into microtransit policymaking. The approach operates by (1) leveraging citywide synthetic data to achieve greater spatiotemporal granularity, (2) estimating a nonparametric nested model for joint travel mode and ride-pass subscription choices, and (3) employing a simulation-based method to calculate revenue and traveler benefits under various policy scenarios. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach through a case study in Arlington, TX, one of the largest deployments of microtransit (Via) in the U.S. Using the simulation-based workflow, we evaluate alternative policy scenarios, including ride-pass discounts, event-based subsidies, and place-based subsidies, to assess their impacts on microtransit ridership, system revenue, and traveler welfare. The results indicate that reducing the weekly pass price from $25 to $18.9 and the monthly pass price from $80 to $71.5 would increase total revenue by approximately $127 per day. A 100% trip fare discount could reduce 61 car trips to AT&T Stadium during a game event while generating an additional 82 microtransit trips per day to Medical City Arlington. However, achieving these mode shifts would require subsidies of approximately $533 per event and $483 per day, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiyuan Ren, Joseph Y. J. Chow, Venktesh Pandey, Linfei Yuan. 2026-05-07. Microtransit revenue management informed by citywide travel demand and joint subscription-mode choice modeling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105046

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Difference-in-Differences with Unpoolable Data

Difference-in-differences (DID) is commonly used to estimate treatment effects but is infeasible in settings where data are unpoolable due to privacy concerns or legal restrictions on data sharing, particularly across jurisdictions. In this study, we identify and relax the assumption of data poolability in DID estimation. We propose an innovative approach to estimate DID with unpoolable data (UN-DID) which can accommodate covariates, multiple groups, and staggered adoption. Through analytical proofs and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that UN-DID and conventional DID estimates of the average treatment effect and standard errors are equal and unbiased in settings without covariates. With covariates, both methods produce estimates that are unbiased, equivalent, and converge to the true value. The estimates differ slightly but the statistical inference and substantive conclusions remain the same. Two empirical examples with real-world data further underscore UN-DID's utility. The UN-DID method allows the estimation of cross-jurisdictional treatment effects with unpoolable data, enabling better counterfactuals to be used and new research questions to be answered.

econ.EM

The Promise of Time-Series Foundation Models for Agricultural Forecasting: Evidence from Commodity Prices

Forecasting agricultural markets remains challenging due to nonlinear dynamics, structural breaks, and sparse data. A long-standing belief holds that simple time-series methods outperform more advanced alternatives. This paper provides the first systematic evidence that this belief no longer holds with modern time-series foundation models (TSFMs). Using USDA ERS monthly commodity price data from 1997-2025, we evaluate 17 forecasting approaches across four model classes, including traditional time-series, machine learning, deep learning, and five state-of-the-art TSFMs (Chronos, Chronos-2, TimesFM 2.5, Time-MoE, Moirai-2), and construct annual marketing year price predictions to compare with USDA's futures-based season-average price (SAP) forecasts. We show that zero-shot foundation models consistently outperform traditional time-series methods, machine learning, and deep learning architectures trained from scratch in both monthly and annual forecasting. Furthermore, foundation models remarkably outperform USDA's futures-based forecasts on three of four major commodities despite USDA's information advantage from forward-looking futures markets. Time-MoE delivers the largest accuracy gains, achieving 54.9% improvement on wheat and 18.5% improvement on corn relative to USDA ERS benchmarks on recent data (2017-2024 excluding COVID). These results point to a paradigm shift in agricultural forecasting.

econ.EM

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM