Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2408.13437

Cross-sectional Dependence in Idiosyncratic Volatility

Ilze Kalnina·Kokouvi Tewou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper introduces an econometric framework for analyzing cross-sectional dependence in the idiosyncratic volatilities of assets using high frequency data. We first consider the estimation of standard measures of dependence in the idiosyncratic volatilities such as covariances and correlations. Naive estimators of these measures are biased due to the use of the error-laden estimates of idiosyncratic volatilities. We provide bias-corrected estimators and the relevant asymptotic theory. Next, we introduce an idiosyncratic volatility factor model, in which we decompose the variation in idiosyncratic volatilities into two parts: the variation related to the systematic factors such as the market volatility, and the residual variation. Again, naive estimators of the decomposition are biased, and we provide bias-corrected estimators. We also provide the asymptotic theory that allows us to test whether the residual (non-systematic) components of the idiosyncratic volatilities exhibit cross-sectional dependence. We apply our methodology to the S&P 100 index constituents, and document strong cross-sectional dependence in their idiosyncratic volatilities. We consider two different sets of idiosyncratic volatility factors, and find that neither can fully account for the cross-sectional dependence in idiosyncratic volatilities. For each model, we map out the network of dependencies in residual (non-systematic) idiosyncratic volatilities across all stocks.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ilze Kalnina, Kokouvi Tewou. 2025-05-07. Cross-sectional Dependence in Idiosyncratic Volatility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2025.106003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Inference for Treatment Effects Conditional on Generalized Principal Strata using Instrumental Variables

We propose a general approach to inference for a broad class of models that arise in the analysis of treatment effects with discrete-valued treatments and instruments and a general-valued outcome. In addition to instrument exogeneity, the main substantive assumption in our class of models rules out certain response types by assuming that they occur with probability zero. Here, the response type refers to the vector of potential outcomes and potential treatments, and we refer to a set of possible values for the response type as a generalized principal stratum. Through a series of examples, we show that this framework encompasses a wide variety of assumptions that have been considered in the previous literature. Our framework allows inference on any treatment effect parameter that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. We develop methods for inference on such parameters under these assumptions, as well as methods for testing the validity of the assumptions themselves. A key result of our analysis is a characterization of the identified set for such parameters under these assumptions and the testable restrictions for the assumptions themselves in terms of existence of a nonnegative solution to linear systems of equations with a special structure. We propose methods for inference exploiting this special structure and recent results in Fang et al. (2023).

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Raking for estimation and inference in panel models with nonignorable attrition and refreshment

In panel data subject to nonignorable attrition, auxiliary (refreshment) sampling may restore full identification under weak assumptions on the attrition process. Despite their generality, these identification strategies have seen limited empirical use, largely because the implied estimation procedure requires solving a functional minimization problem for the target density. When the distributions of the observed data are parametric, we show that this problem can be solved using the iterative proportional fitting (raking) algorithm, which converges rapidly even with continuous data. The resulting density estimator is then used as input into a parametric moment condition. We establish consistency and convergence rates for both the raking-based density estimator and the resulting moment estimator. We also derive a simple recursive procedure for estimating the asymptotic variance. Finally, we demonstrate the satisfactory performance of our estimator in simulations and provide an empirical illustration using data from the Understanding America Study panel.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Summary Indices in Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper studies the practice of combining multiple outcomes into a summary index to estimate a causal effect. For common estimators and index constructions, the estimate equals a weighted sum of the estimated effects on the components, with weights that are implicit and rarely reported. The paper derives the weights and shows that, for inverse-covariance-weighted indices, they can be negative and unrestricted in magnitude, so the index effect can have the opposite sign to every component effect. The paper proposes two procedures for valid inference on the index effect: a variance estimator that accounts for the data-dependent weights, and a shifted t-test that requires no such correction. Conventional t-tests of the null of no effect remain valid. Contrary to common claims, summary indices do not generally improve power. Three published studies illustrate the results.

econ.EM↗