Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2409.04153

A Stackelberg Game based on the Secretary Problem: Optimal Response is History Dependent

Abstract

This article considers a problem arising from a two-player game based on the classical secretary problem. First, Player 1 selects one object from a sequence as in the secretary problem. All of the other objects are then presented to Player 2 in the same order as in the original sequence. The goal of both players is to select the best object. The optimal response of Player 2 is adapted to the optimal strategy in the secretary problem. This means that when Player 2 observes an object that is the best seen so far, it can be inferred whether Player 1 selected one of the earlier objects in the original sequence. However, Player 2 cannot compare the current object with the one selected by Player 1. Hence, this game defines an auxiliary problem in which Player 2 has incomplete information on the relative rank of an object. It is shown that the optimal strategy of Player 2 is based on both the number of objects to have appeared and the probability that the current object is better than the object chosen by Player 1 (if Player 1 chose an earlier object in the sequence). However, this probability is dependent on the previously observed objects. A lower bound on the optimal expected reward in the auxiliary problem is defined by limiting the memory of Player 2. An upper bound is derived by giving Player 2 additional information at appropriate times. The methods used illustrate approaches that can be used to approximate the optimal reward in a stopping problem when there is incomplete information on the ranks of objects and/or the optimal strategy is history dependent, as in the Robbins' problem

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Ramsey. 2024-09-06. A Stackelberg Game based on the Secretary Problem: Optimal Response is History Dependent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT