Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.05361

Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2: A Collaboratively Expanding Benchmark for Measuring the Capabilities of Spoken Language Models with 180 Tasks

Abstract

Multimodal foundation models, such as Gemini and ChatGPT, have revolutionized human-machine interactions by seamlessly integrating various forms of data. Developing a universal spoken language model that comprehends a wide range of natural language instructions is critical for bridging communication gaps and facilitating more intuitive interactions. However, the absence of a comprehensive evaluation benchmark poses a significant challenge. We present Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2, an open and evolving benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of instruction-based universal speech models. Building upon the first generation, this second version incorporates 125 new tasks contributed collaboratively by the global research community, expanding the benchmark to a total of 180 tasks, making it the largest benchmark for speech and audio evaluation. While the first generation of Dynamic-SUPERB was limited to classification tasks, Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2 broadens its evaluation capabilities by introducing a wide array of novel and diverse tasks, including regression and sequence generation, across speech, music, and environmental audio. Evaluation results show that no model performed well universally. SALMONN-13B excelled in English ASR and Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct showed high accuracy in emotion recognition, but current models still require further innovations to handle a broader range of tasks. We open-source all task data and the evaluation pipeline at https://github.com/dynamic-superb/dynamic-superb.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chien-yu Huang, Wei-Chih Chen, Shu-wen Yang, Andy T. Liu, Chen-An Li, Yu-Xiang Lin, Wei-Cheng Tseng, Anuj Diwan, Yi-Jen Shih, Jiatong Shi, William Chen, Chih-Kai Yang, Wenze Ren, Xuanjun Chen, Chi-Yuan Hsiao, Puyuan Peng, Shih-Heng Wang, Chun-Yi Kuan, Ke-Han Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Fabian Ritter-Gutierrez, Kuan-Po Huang, Siddhant Arora, You-Kuan Lin, Ming To Chuang, Eunjung Yeo, Kalvin Chang, Chung-Ming Chien, Kwanghee Choi, Jun-You Wang, Cheng-Hsiu Hsieh, Yi-Cheng Lin, Chee-En Yu, I-Hsiang Chiu, Heitor R. Guimarães, Jionghao Han, Tzu-Quan Lin, Tzu-Yuan Lin, Homu Chang, Ting-Wu Chang, Chun Wei Chen, Shou-Jen Chen, Yu-Hua Chen, Hsi-Chun Cheng, Kunal Dhawan, Jia-Lin Fang, Shi-Xin Fang, Kuan-Yu Fang Chiang, Chi An Fu, Hsien-Fu Hsiao, Ching Yu Hsu, Shao-Syuan Huang, Lee Chen Wei, Hsi-Che Lin, Hsuan-Hao Lin, Hsuan-Ting Lin, Jian-Ren Lin, Ting-Chun Liu, Li-Chun Lu, Tsung-Min Pai, Ankita Pasad, Shih-Yun Shan Kuan, Suwon Shon, Yuxun Tang, Yun-Shao Tsai, Jui-Chiang Wei, Tzu-Chieh Wei, Chengxi Wu, Dien-Ruei Wu, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Chieh-Chi Yang, Jia Qi Yip, Shao-Xiang Yuan, Vahid Noroozi, Zhehuai Chen, Haibin Wu, Karen Livescu, David Harwath, Shinji Watanabe, Hung-yi Lee. 2025-06-09. Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2: A Collaboratively Expanding Benchmark for Measuring the Capabilities of Spoken Language Models with 180 Tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05361

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Survey

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning tasks, which leads to the development of increasingly large models. However, scaling up model sizes results in significantly higher computational costs and energy consumption, which makes these models impractical for academic researchers and businesses with limited resources. At the same time, Small Models (SMs) are frequently used in practical settings, although their significance is currently underestimated. This raises important questions about the role of small models in the era of LLMs, a topic that has received limited attention in prior surveys. In this work, we systematically examine the relationship between LLMs and SMs from two key perspectives: Collaboration and Competition (or Complementarity). We hope this survey provides valuable insights for practitioners, fostering a deeper understanding of the contribution of small models and promoting more efficient use of computational resources.

cs.CL

SG-FSM: A Self-Guiding Zero-Shot Prompting Paradigm for Multi-Hop Question Answering Based on Finite State Machine

Large Language Models with chain-of-thought prompting, such as OpenAI-o1, have shown impressive capabilities in natural language inference tasks. However, Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) remains challenging for many existing models due to issues like hallucination, error propagation, and limited context length. To address these challenges and enhance LLMs' performance on MHQA, we propose the Self-Guiding prompting Finite State Machine (SG-FSM), designed to strengthen multi-hop reasoning abilities. Unlike traditional chain-of-thought methods, SG-FSM tackles MHQA by iteratively breaking down complex questions into sub-questions, correcting itself to improve accuracy. It processes one sub-question at a time, dynamically deciding the next step based on the current context and results, functioning much like an automaton. Experiments across various benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, outperforming strong baselines on challenging datasets such as Musique. SG-FSM reduces hallucination, enabling recovery of the correct final answer despite intermediate errors. It also improves adherence to specified output formats, simplifying evaluation significantly.

cs.CL

A Course Intelligence Platform for Higher Education: Lessons from AI-Assisted Course Evaluation

The rapid adoption of generative AI has created new opportunities for teaching, learning, and quality assurance. Existing applications, however, remain largely student-facing, with comparatively limited attention to institution-level needs. This paper presents a course intelligence platform deployed across more than 100 universities and serving over 10,000 instructors in China. By linking competency requirements, knowledge structures, teaching activities, and assessment evidence, it establishes a shared foundation for knowledge organization, instructional design, learning assessment, and quality evaluation. The course evaluation module is examined as a representative institution-facing application of the platform, which integrates national evaluation standards, structured educational evidence, customized prompting strategies, and domain-adapted LLMs to generate quantitative scores and qualitative feedback. A case study involving 100 authentic university courses is conducted to evaluate its alignment with expert judgments and the interpretability of its outputs. Statistical analyses show substantial agreement between AI-generated assessments and expert ratings, while qualitative results highlight the credibility of the feedback. The findings further suggest that AI-assisted evaluation requires not only capable models but also structured domain knowledge and transparent criteria. In this context, human ratings should be treated as an informative reference rather than an error-free gold standard, and the objective is to achieve consistent, interpretable, and defensible judgments instead of merely replicating expert scores.

cs.CL