Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.07086

To Train or Not to Train: Balancing Efficiency and Training Cost in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Edge Computing

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a key component of 6G networks, as it enables communication and computing services to adapt to end users' requirements and demand patterns. The management of Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is a meaningful example of AI application: computational resources available at the network edge need to be carefully allocated to users, whose jobs may have different priorities and latency requirements. The research community has developed several AI algorithms to perform this resource allocation, but it has neglected a key aspect: learning is itself a computationally demanding task, and considering free training results in idealized conditions and performance in simulations. In this work, we consider a more realistic case in which the cost of learning is specifically accounted for, presenting a new algorithm to dynamically select when to train a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent that allocates resources. Our method is highly general, as it can be directly applied to any scenario involving a training overhead, and it can approach the same performance as an ideal learning agent even under realistic training conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Maddalena Boscaro, Federico Mason, Federico Chiariotti, Andrea Zanella. 2024-11-11. To Train or Not to Train: Balancing Efficiency and Training Cost in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Edge Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/icc52391.2025.11160980

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

Transformer-Based Autonomous Driving Models and Deployment-Oriented Compression: A Survey

Transformer-based models are becoming a central paradigm in autonomous driving because they can capture long-range spatial dependencies, multi-agent interactions, and multimodal context across perception, prediction, and planning. At the same time, their deployment in real vehicles remains difficult because high-capacity attention-based architectures impose substantial latency, memory, and energy overhead. This survey reviews representative Transformer-based autonomous driving models and organizes them by task role, sensing configuration, and architectural design. More importantly, it examines these models from a deployment-oriented perspective and analyzes how efficiency constraints reshape model design choices in practice. We further review compression and acceleration strategies relevant to Transformer-based driving systems, including quantization, pruning, knowledge distillation, low-rank approximation, and efficient attention, and discuss their benefits, limitations, and task-dependent applicability. Rather than treating compression as an isolated post-processing step, we highlight it as a system-level design consideration that directly affects deployability, robustness, and safety. Finally, we identify open challenges and future research directions toward standardized, safety-aware, and hardware-conscious evaluation of efficient autonomous driving systems.

cs.LG

Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Small UAS Separation Assurance under GPS Degradation and Spoofing

We address robust separation assurance for small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) under GPS degradation and spoofing via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). In cooperative surveillance, each aircraft (or agent) broadcasts its GPS-derived position; when such position broadcasts are corrupted, the entire observed air traffic state becomes unreliable. We cast this state observation corruption as a zero-sum game between the agents and an adversary: with probability R, the adversary perturbs the observed state to maximally degrade each agent's safety performance. We derive a closed-form expression for this adversarial perturbation, bypassing the iterative inner optimization of adversarial training entirely and enabling linear-time evaluation in the state dimension. We show that this expression approximates the exact minimizer of the value function over the modeled uncertainty set with second-order accuracy. We further bound the safety performance gap between clean and corrupted observations, showing that it degrades at most linearly with the corruption probability under Kullback-Leibler regularization. Finally, we integrate the closed-form adversarial policy into a MARL policy gradient algorithm to obtain a robust counter-policy for the agents. In a high-density sUAS simulation, we observe near-zero collision rates under corruption levels up to 35%, outperforming a baseline policy trained without adversarial perturbations.

cs.RO