Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2412.08472

Local Identifiability of Networks with Nonlinear Node Dynamics

Abstract

We study the identifiability of nonlinear network systems with partial excitation and partial measurement when the network dynamics is linear on the edges and nonlinear on the nodes. We assume that the graph topology and the nonlinear functions at the node level are known, and we aim to identify the weight matrix of the graph. Our main result is that, for almost all static analytic nonlinearities that cross the origin, directed graphs are generically locally identifiable if and only if at least one node is excited in every source component of the condensation graph and at least one node is measured in every sink component. This holds even when all other nodes remain unexcited and unmeasured and stands in sharp contrast to most findings on network identifiability requiring measurement and/or excitation of each node. The result applies to homogeneous feed-forward and recurrent artificial neural networks and generalizes previous literature by considering a broader class of activations and architectures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Martina Vanelli, Julien M. Hendrickx. 2026-08-31. Local Identifiability of Networks with Nonlinear Node Dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08472

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Comment on "Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Time-Delay Systems via Halanay-Type Inequality"

This comment revisits Lemma 1 in [1], which plays a central role in the event-triggered stabilization analysis developed therein. We identify technical gaps in the proof of the lemma and provide a corrected argument. In particular, careful treatment of the exponentially decaying term shows that its decay rate must be retained in the resulting convergence estimate. The statement of the original lemma, with the exponential decay rate determined by the minimum of the characteristic decay rate and the decay rate of this term, remains valid.

math.OC