Moderating the Mediation Bootstrap for Causal Inference

Kees Jan van Garderen; Noud van Giersbergen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2412.11285

Moderating the Mediation Bootstrap for Causal Inference

Kees Jan van Garderen·Noud van Giersbergen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mediation analysis is a form of causal inference that investigates indirect effects and causal mechanisms. Confidence intervals for indirect effects play a central role in conducting inference. The problem is non-standard leading to coverage rates that deviate considerably from their nominal level. The default inference method in the mediation model is the paired bootstrap, which resamples directly from the observed data. However, a residual bootstrap that explicitly exploits the assumed causal structure (X->M->Y) could also be applied. There is also a debate whether the bias-corrected (BC) bootstrap method is superior to the percentile method, with the former showing liberal behavior (actual coverage too low) in certain circumstances. Moreover, bootstrap methods tend to be very conservative (coverage higher than required) when mediation effects are small. Finally, iterated bootstrap methods like the double bootstrap have not been considered due to their high computational demands. We investigate the issues mentioned in the simple mediation model by a large-scale simulation. Results are explained using graphical methods and the newly derived finite-sample distribution. The main findings are: (i) conservative behavior of the bootstrap is caused by extreme dependence of the bootstrap distribution's shape on the estimated coefficients (ii) this dependence leads to counterproductive correction of the the double bootstrap. The added randomness of the BC method inflates the coverage in the absence of mediation, but still leads to (invalid) liberal inference when the mediation effect is small.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kees Jan van Garderen, Noud van Giersbergen. 2024-12-15. Moderating the Mediation Bootstrap for Causal Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11285

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Ordinal Distributional Change and Conservative Transition Benchmarks: Measurement, Identification, and Inference

Repeated cross-sections reveal changes in ordinal distributions but not the transitions producing them. I axiomatically characterize a threshold-weighted probability metric for ordinal change from threshold-crossing principles. For any threshold-additive ordinal geometry, the discrepancy coincides with the Wasserstein--1 distance induced by that ground metric and measures minimum displacement; its optimizing plans define conservative transition benchmarks. With missing outcomes, I derive sharp identified sets for the discrepancy and endpoint-conditioned benchmark plans. I develop finite-sample-valid projection inference using randomized Monte Carlo calibration and global search with an almost-sure convergence guarantee. Applied to Arab Barometer data, the framework documents a robust shift toward broader and more regular remittance receipt in Lebanon. The discrepancy interval remains well separated from zero after allowing for item nonresponse and sampling uncertainty, while benchmark bounds provide strong numerical evidence that least-displacement restructuring excludes movement toward less frequent receipt and requires reassignment from nonreceipt to recurrent receipt.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

A Stochastic Nested Fixed Point Algorithm for Large-Scale BLP Estimation

We develop a stochastic nested fixed point (SNFP) estimator for random coefficients logit demand models that updates model parameters using stochastic gradients and performs demand inversion one market at a time. Relative to the conventional nested fixed point (NFP) estimator, SNFP substantially reduces memory requirements and computational cost, making estimation feasible in very large datasets. We establish the large-$T$ (number of markets) asymptotic properties of the estimator under regularity conditions. We also characterize the effect of sharing one block of simulation draws across markets and show how to correct for it. Monte Carlo simulations show that the SNFP estimator achieves statistical accuracy comparable to the NFP estimator, and in our benchmark a single online pass estimates a model with 100 million markets in about 5.5 hours. An empirical application using scanner data further demonstrates the practical advantages of SNFP for large-scale demand estimation.

econ.EM↗