Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.13375

Diversity-seeking swap games in networks

Abstract

Schelling games use a game-theoretic approach to study the phenomenon of residential segregation as originally modeled by Schelling. Inspired by the recent increase in the number of people and businesses preferring and promoting diversity, we propose swap games under three diversity-seeking utility functions: the binary utility of an agent is 1 if it has a neighbor of a different type, and 0 otherwise; the difference-seeking utility of an agent is equal to the number of its neighbors of a different type; the variety-seeking utility of an agent is equal to the number of types different from its own in its neighborhood. We consider four global measures of diversity: degree of integration, number of colorful edges, neighborhood variety, and evenness, and prove asymptotically tight or almost tight bounds on the price of anarchy with respect to these measures on both general graphs, as well as on cycles, cylinders, and tori that model residential neighborhoods. We complement our theoretical results with simulations of our swap games starting either from random placements of agents, or from segregated placements. Our simulation results are generally consistent with our theoretical results, showing that segregation is effectively removed when agents are diversity-seeking; however strong diversity, such as measured by neighborhood variety and evenness, is harder to achieve by our swap games.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yaqiao Li, Lata Narayanan, Jaroslav Opatrny, Yi Tian Xu. 2025-02-19. Diversity-seeking swap games in networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13375

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT