Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.09083

Impact of Engagement Allocation Across Social Platform Modalities on E-Commerce Performance

Abstract

Firms increasingly operate across multiple social media platforms, yet it remains unclear whether diversifying engagement across platforms enhances performance or simply fragments marketing efforts. We examine how the allocation of user engagement across platforms affects e commerce sales performance. Using panel data on approximately 2,000 leading U.S. online retailers from 2012 to 2019, combined with detailed engagement measures across five major social media platforms, we construct firm year indicators of engagement diversification and explore how they relate to sales performance. We find that greater diversification in engagement allocation is associated with significantly higher web sales. Importantly, this effect is not driven by platform adoption breadth or overall engagement volume. Rather than increasing traffic quantity, diversification improves conversion rates and enhances traffic quality. Mechanism analyses reveal that these performance gains stem from cross modality complementarities: engagement distributed across heterogeneous content modalities (image, video, and mixed) generates reinforcing brand exposure, whereas diversification across platforms within the same modality yields limited benefits. Furthermore, the positive effects of diversification arise only when there is sufficient overlap in audiences across platforms, providing additional evidence for a memory-reinforcement mechanism. Taken together, these findings document the importance of engagement allocation structure and highlight the role of cross-modality complementarities in multi platform digital marketing strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaoning Wang, Yakov Bart, Serguei Netessine, Lynn Wu. 2026-07-02. Impact of Engagement Allocation Across Social Platform Modalities on E-Commerce Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN