Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.10663

Optimal Transport for Brain-Image Alignment: Unveiling Redundancy and Synergy in Neural Information Processing

Abstract

The design of artificial neural networks (ANNs) is inspired by the structure of the human brain, and in turn, ANNs offer a potential means to interpret and understand brain signals. Existing methods primarily align brain signals with stimulus signals using Mean Squared Error (MSE), which focuses only on local point-wise alignment and ignores global matching, leading to coarse interpretations and inaccuracies in brain signal decoding. In this paper, we address these issues through optimal transport (OT) and theoretically demonstrate why OT provides a more effective alignment strategy than MSE. Specifically, we construct a transport plan between brain voxel embeddings and image embeddings, enabling more precise matching. By controlling the amount of transport, we mitigate the influence of redundant information. We apply our alignment model directly to the Brain Captioning task by feeding brain signals into a large language model (LLM) instead of images. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance across ten evaluation metrics, surpassing the previous best method by an average of 6.11\% in single-subject training and 3.81\% in cross-subject training. Additionally, we have uncovered several insightful conclusions that align with existing brain research. We unveil the redundancy and synergy of brain information processing through region masking and data dimensionality reduction visualization experiments. We believe our approach paves the way for a more precise understanding of brain signals in the future. The code is available at https://github.com/NKUShaw/OT-Alignment4brain-to-image.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yang Xiao, Wang Lu, Jie Ji, Ruimeng Ye, Gen Li, Xiaolong Ma, Bo Hui. 2025-10-06. Optimal Transport for Brain-Image Alignment: Unveiling Redundancy and Synergy in Neural Information Processing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10663

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identifying Neural State Changes due to Gain versus Off-Manifold Displacement

Memory segmentation is thought to arise from rapid decorrelation in neural activity, often quantified by Euclidean distance or cosine angle. Although these metrics detect a transition, they do not reveal how the new state relates to the repertoire represented by the neural manifold. This matters because neuromodulators that drive state transitions also alter excitability, and learning may repurpose existing representations or create new ones. Here, I introduce a geometric decomposition that separates changes attributable to gain modulation of a nearby manifold state from movement within the manifold and genuine off-manifold displacement. The approach uses the radial axis of neural population activity to partition the normal space of a local manifold region. A central challenge is identifiability: given only a static reference manifold and a single test state, neither the state from which a perturbation began nor its gain magnitude and mechanistic decomposition can generally be recovered uniquely. I therefore formulate identifiability as a cascade of geometric gates specifying when each component can be interpreted. The gates distinguish structural failures, including the absence of a local chart or incorrect intrinsic dimensionality, from estimation error and systematic bias caused by reference sampling, tangent-frame error, gain-axis misalignment, anchor displacement, and poor ratio conditioning. Simulations show that neighborhood size, curvature, sampling density, ambient dimension, and noise act through a small set of geometric quantities. The framework specifies when assignments to gain or novelty are identifiable, how they become biased, and which diagnostics reveal the relevant failure regime. By quantifying the nature rather than only the magnitude of neural state change, it provides a clear, readily interpretable framework for evaluating mechanisms of neural state transitions.

q-bio.NC

Neural Langevin Machine: a local asymmetric learning rule can be creative

Fixed points of recurrent neural networks can be leveraged to store and generate information. These fixed points are captured by the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure, which leads to neural Langevin dynamics that relax to those fixed points for generative learning of a real dataset. We call this type of generative model a neural Langevin machine, which derives an asymmetric and firing-rate-speed-adjusted learning rule requiring only local neural signals, thereby bearing biological relevance in terms of local predictive learning. An out-of-equilibrium regime of the generative process is revealed, together with a memorization-to-generalization transition with increasing training data size. The neuro-inspired machine can also realize a continuous exploration of the phase space for different kinds of generative images and can denoise a corrupted image as well.

q-bio.NC

A Mathematical Model of Motivated Emotional Mind - Cognitive Embodied System

This article presents a mathematical model of the Motivated Emotional Mind cognitive architecture developed for embodied intelligent systems. Such a system learns to maintain its homeostasis through a generalized form of reinforcement learning based on its internal motivations, termed motivated learning (ML). The principal contribution of this article is a rigorous formalization of the re-entrant loop integrating feedforward processing, lateral interactions, and feedback pathways, together with the representational selection mechanisms that govern adaptive system responses. The model specifies how ongoing exteroceptive and interoceptive signals, bodily-motivational context, and memory traces are bound into associative memory structures termed semblions, which compete for access to further processing and top-down reconstruction. The formalization encompasses secondary perception, representational competition, curiosity, procedural gaps, and action selection directed toward limiting allostatic violations. Within this framework, motivated learning is tailored to embodied systems whose dynamics are shaped by needs, affect, and the current regulatory state. Unlike standard reinforcement-learning models, the proposed approach incorporates need thresholds, goal generation and shifting goals, bodily state, resource constraints, and action uncertainty, thereby providing a more adequate account of response selection under regulatory pressure. Global affect functions as a central control signal, modulating the learning rate, representational valence, and the balance between exploration and exploitation. The model presented here is a step toward a more rigorous formalization of cognitive phenomena and may provide a basis for further theoretical analysis, computer simulation, and implementation in artificial-intelligence systems inspired by biological processes.

q-bio.NC