Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.14488

Engineering Systems for Data Analysis Using Interactive Structured Inductive Programming

Abstract

Engineering information systems for scientific data analysis presents significant challenges: complex workflows requiring exploration of large solution spaces, close collaboration with domain specialists, and the need for maintainable, interpretable implementations. Traditional manual development is time-consuming, while "No Code" approaches using large language models (LLMs) often produce unreliable systems. We present iProg, a tool implementing Interactive Structured Inductive Programming. iProg employs a variant of a '2-way Intelligibility' communication protocol to constrain collaborative system construction by a human and an LLM. Specifically, given a natural-language description of the overall data analysis task, iProg uses an LLM to first identify an appropriate decomposition of the problem into a declarative representation, expressed as a Data Flow Diagram (DFD). In a second phase, iProg then uses an LLM to generate code for each DFD process. In both stages, human feedback, mediated through the constructs provided by the communication protocol, is used to verify LLMs' outputs. We evaluate iProg extensively on two published scientific collaborations (astrophysics and biochemistry), demonstrating that it is possible to identify appropriate system decompositions and construct end-to-end information systems with better performance, higher code quality, and order-of-magnitude faster development compared to Low Code/No Code alternatives. The tool is available at: https://shraddhasurana.github.io/dhaani/

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shraddha Surana, Ashwin Srinivasan, Michael Bain. 2026-03-08. Engineering Systems for Data Analysis Using Interactive Structured Inductive Programming. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-28110-4_14

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Antipatterns in AI-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: A Catalog of Temptations and Pitfalls for Software Engineering Researchers

AI-assisted qualitative data analysis (QDA) offers unprecedented opportunities to streamline software engineering (SE) research, yet uncritical use risks compromising analytical rigor and flooding the field with accelerated production of low-quality research. While tactical best practices will naturally evolve over time, SE researchers currently lack strategic guidance to identify and mitigate methodological risks when attempting AI-assisted QDA. Based on our decades of qualitative SE research expertise and experience combined with an understanding of the emerging landscape of AI-assisted QDA, this paper presents a catalog of antipatterns in AI-assisted QDA - a set of assumptions and practices that initially appear advantageous but ultimately undermine analytical rigor and validity. The antipatterns are grouped into three categories reflecting escalating impact: Dangerous Drivers, Operational Missteps, and Analytical Failures. As more SE researchers attempt AI-assisted QDA, these antipatterns will help them identify and avoid common temptations and pitfalls, while reviewers can be equipped with the vocabulary and criteria to call out problematic and failed practice. Ultimately, this catalog of antipatterns can serve as a stepping stone in our responsible methodological evolution toward principled and meaningful human-AI collaboration in qualitative research.

cs.SE

What Does an Evaluation License? A Commit-Bound Census of Claim Replay in Inspect Evals

Benchmarks can run without determining what their results license. We freeze a large evaluation collection and attempt to replay its historical claims. Most units stop because the evidence required for replay is not bound. Where replay is possible, different claims remain stable at different resolutions. We make this otherwise implicit inference step explicit and executable.

cs.SE

SE-GoS: Self-Evolving Graph-of-Skills for Skill Library at Scale

Modern LLM agents increasingly rely on reusable skills, yet as skill libraries scale to thousands of entries, effective retrieval becomes a bottleneck. Graph-of-Skills (GoS) addresses this challenge by exploiting dependency-aware graph structure for scalable skill retrieval, while SkillDAG further demonstrates that skill graphs can accumulate execution-backed structure online. However, these approaches leave open whether historical execution traces can be systematically distilled into a better retrieval graph that generalizes to unseen tasks. We present Self-Evolving Graph-of-Skills (SE-GoS), a training-free framework that evolves an existing GoS graph from execution traces while preserving the original retrieval pipeline. SE-GoS performs three complementary updates: topology evolution that discovers and prunes skill relationships from execution evidence, edge-weight evolution that reinforces retrieval-relevant relationships based on historical effectiveness, and description evolution that optimizes retrieval-facing skill descriptions using execution feedback. Across three LLMs on SkillsBench, SE-GoS consistently improves task reward while reducing input tokens relative to full skill loading, with gains varying across model families. In a representative setting, one evolution round improves reward from 52.4\% to 59.4\% while reducing input tokens by approximately one-third relative to full skill loading, and the resulting graph transfers to a disjoint held-out split with a 5.4-point improvement over the static GoS baseline. These results show that skill graphs can be improved from execution experience without model training, changes to the retrieval algorithm, or modifications to skill content, turning a static retrieval graph into an evolving retrieval infrastructure.

cs.AI