Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2503.14940

Linear programming approach to partially identified econometric models

Abstract

Sharp bounds on partially identified parameters are often given by the values of linear programs (LPs). This paper introduces a novel estimator of the LP value. Unlike existing procedures, our estimator is root-n-consistent, pointwise in the probability measure, whenever the population LP is feasible and finite. Our estimator is valid under point-identification, over-identifying constraints, and solution multiplicity. Turning to uniformity properties, we prove that the LP value cannot be uniformly consistently estimated without restricting the set of possible distributions. We then show that our estimator achieves uniform consistency under a condition that is minimal for the existence of any such estimator. We obtain computationally efficient, asymptotically normal inference procedure with exact asymptotic coverage at any fixed probability measure. To complement our estimation results, we derive LP sharp bounds in a general identification setting. We apply our findings to estimating returns to education. To that end, we propose the conditionally monotone IV assumption (cMIV) that tightens the classical monotone IV (MIV) bounds and is testable under a mild regularity condition. Under cMIV, university education in Colombia is shown to increase the average wage by at least $5.5\%$, whereas classical conditions fail to yield an informative bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrei Voronin. 2025-03-19. Linear programming approach to partially identified econometric models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14940

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Conditional-Moment Estimation and Inference in the BLP Model

The random-coefficient demand model of Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995) is commonly estimated by the generalized method of moments (GMM), using an unconditional moment restriction with a fixed set of instruments. Identification of the model, however, rests on a conditional moment restriction. The two are not equivalent: the unconditional restriction may admit additional parameter values. We construct a counterexample in which the model is identified by the conditional restriction yet standard GMM is not, even with the optimal instrument. Building directly on the identifying restriction, we propose a two-step estimator, following Ai and Chen (2003), that first estimates the relevant conditional expectations nonparametrically and then selects the structural parameters by a conditional-variance-weighted minimum-distance criterion; standard GMM is recovered as the special case of a linear projection onto finitely many instruments. We establish root-T asymptotic normality for the proposed estimator, and we develop the theory for both kernel and series implementations of the first stage. The two implementations share a common limiting distribution, attaining the semiparametric efficiency bound. Simulation evidence illustrates the consequences of the identification gap and demonstrates that the proposed estimator outperforms standard GMM in finite samples.

econ.EM↗

Generic Covariate Adjustment for Regression Discontinuity Designs

It is standard practice to include covariates in regression discontinuity designs (RDDs) and regression kink designs (RKDs), but the theoretical justification for doing so does not generally extend beyond linear estimands. This paper proposes a novel entropy balancing reweighting approach for covariate adjustment within a general framework of RDDs and RKDs. While conventional regression-based covariate adjustment methods generally fail to deliver consistent estimation for nonlinear estimands such as quantile treatment effects, our reweighting approach achieves consistency while improving efficiency. Moreover, even in settings where the regression-based covariate adjustment method already improves efficiency, our approach can deliver additional efficiency gains. Simulation studies corroborate these theoretical findings. We present an empirical application in which our covariate adjustment yields statistically significant results that would not be obtained without covariate adjustment.

econ.EM↗

Kernel Balancing in Tree-based Methods

Studying heterogeneous treatment effects has become essential in experimental and observational studies. A critical assumption for obtaining reliable treatment effect estimates is overlap, which requires that treated and control units have sufficiently similar covariate distributions. Poor overlap may limit the effectiveness of estimators, especially those based on propensity scores, potentially leading to unreliable results. We investigate the effectiveness of kernel balancing (KBal) (Hazlett, 2020) as an alternative to propensity score methods for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation, particularly in settings with overlap violations. Building on optimization-based balancing approaches, we integrate KBal weights into tree-based methods, specifically, causal forests (Athey et al., 2019) and the X-Learner (XRF) (Künzel et al., 2019), to assess their impact on bias reduction and estimation precision. Monte Carlo evidence shows that KBal achieves near-exact balance in a transformed feature space, thereby improving treatment effect estimation in cases where traditional reweighting methods struggle due to extreme weights, finite-sample bias, or insufficient removal of pre-existing confounding bias. We apply the proposed methods to the semi-synthetic IHDP benchmark dataset. Overall, the results indicate that KBal leads to performance improvements, especially in settings with nonlinear treatment effects and limited overlap, making it a useful alternative to propensity score methods.

econ.EM↗