Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.22967

Student-Powered Digital Scholarship CoLab Project in the HKUST Library: Develop a Chinese Named-Entity Recognition (NER) Tool within One Semester from the Ground Up

Abstract

Starting in February 2024, the HKUST Library further extended the scope of AI literacy to AI utilization, which focuses on fostering student involvement in utilizing state-of-the-art technologies in the projects that initiated by the Library, named "Digital Scholarship (DS) CoLab". A key focus of the DS CoLab scheme has been on cultivating talents and enabling students to utilize advanced technologies in practical context. It aims to reinforce the library's role as a catalyst and hub for fostering multidisciplinary collaboration and cultivate the "can do spirit" among university members. The Library offers 1-2 projects per year for students to engage with advanced technologies in practical contexts while supporting the Library in tackling challenges and streamlining operational tasks. The tool that introduced in this paper was mainly developed by two of the authors, Sherry Yip Sau Lai and Berry Han Liuruo, as part-time student helpers under one of our DS CoLab scheme in the 2024 Spring Semester (February to May 2024). This paper details the complete journey from ideation to implementation of developing a Chinese Named-Entity Recognition (NER) Tool from the group up within one semester, from the initial research and planning stages to execution and come up a viable product. The collaborative spirit fostered by this project, with students playing a central role, exemplifies the power and potential of innovative educational models that prioritize hands-on learning with student involvement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sherry S. L. Yip, Berry L. Han, Holly H. Y. Chan. 2025-03-29. Student-Powered Digital Scholarship CoLab Project in the HKUST Library: Develop a Chinese Named-Entity Recognition (NER) Tool within One Semester from the Ground Up. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22967

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

From Code Archival to Knowledge Graph: Bridging Software Heritage, COAR Notify and Wikidata

Software is a first-class scientific object, yet validated links between source code and the scholarly record remain largely absent from the Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud, isolating archived artefacts from semantic discovery. This paper presents an end-to-end reconciliation pipeline that harvests, validates, and models publication-to-repository pairs from sources where the link between a paper and its source code is explicit and editorially verified: the software-centric journals JOSS, SoftwareX, and IPOL, together with the reproducibility reports of the SIGMOD Availability and Reproducibility Initiative (ARI). This yields a curated corpus of 4,397 $\langle$DOI, repository-URL$\rangle$ pairs. We design two distinct application profiles grounded in Wikidata classes (one for scholarly articles, one for software instances) aligned with the schema.org and CodeMeta vocabularies. This architectural separation enables rule-based reconciliation at two granularities: lightweight, inline publication references or standalone, first-class Wikidata software nodes equipped with SWHIDs, Software Heritage's content-addressed identifiers. A read-only lookup against Wikidata shows that only 82 of the harvested repositories were already modelled there; human-reviewed batches have since created 4{,}182 new software items cross-linked to their articles. We further show that payloads of the emerging COAR Notify protocol, an external effort we do not develop, map natively onto our input format, so the same backend could later serve a live enrichment stream. Our core contribution is a pair of application profiles that turn Wikidata into a connector between the scholarly record and archived source code; we openly release all code, application profiles, and harvested datasets.

cs.DL

greCAPTCHA: Assessing Understanding as Evidence of Research Authorship Under Generative AI

Conferences, journals, funders, schools, and universities are struggling with a surge of potentially AI-generated submissions from ostensibly human authors, who may not have exercised sufficient human oversight for their manuscripts. In turn, institutions evaluating submissions can no longer reliably credit expertise based solely on authors' names on submitted work. To address this problem, we propose greCAPTCHA, a proctored assessment approach that measures authors' understanding of research manuscripts via the construct of capacity to verify, which we define as the knowledge and reasoning required to critically assess the contents underlying one's contributions to a manuscript. greCAPTCHA generates questions assessing multiple levels of understanding and provides an evaluative report based on authors' responses. Using a prototype implementation, we conduct a user study and semi-structured interviews with $31$ researchers to evaluate greCAPTCHA. Its automated scores predict which papers were or were not authored by study participants with an AUC of $0.90$. Participants reported positive overall experiences with the system and remarked on the appropriate construct validity for author understanding, while also suggesting important changes to be made before deployment. Our results provide initial evidence that greCAPTCHA can assess manuscript-specific understanding under proctored conditions.

cs.DL

Geospatial Metadata Improves Discoverability by Connecting Datasets Across Scientific Disciplines

Research data repositories are essential infrastructure for scientific inquiry and for ensuring that datasets follow FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. However, repository reuse depends on the quality and completeness of geospatial and thematic metadata, which researchers generally provide voluntarily. Given limited curation resources, it is unsurprising that even Harvard Dataverse, the world's largest general-purpose research repository, contains many incomplete metadata records. Missing fields represent lost information and reduce interoperability. We find that datasets with more missing metadata receive fewer downstream citations and have fewer resolvable connections to other datasets. The implications are particularly important for geospatial datasets: only 0.3% of research datasets include a bounding box, and most represent archival points rather than complete geographic shapes. Our analysis shows that geospatial metadata helps connect concepts across disciplines. After embedding Harvard Dataverse datasets in a metadata knowledge graph, we find that datasets are twice as likely to connect across scientific disciplines through shared geospatial metadata as through keywords. This suggests that geographic metadata is a more reliable basis for cross-disciplinary interoperability than keyword vocabularies, which often remain discipline-specific. We train and fine-tune a small language model using datasets from Harvard Dataverse. Through geospatial metadata enrichment, we increase the share of datasets from different disciplines connected through metadata elements from 58.5% to 63.2%.

cs.DL