Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2505.23862

mRNA Design and Optimization with Deep Knowledge-Infused Approach

Abstract

The mRNA optimization is essential for mRNA vaccines, therapies, and industrial protein production. Based on current explorations, an ideal optimization approach should simultaneously (i) prevent unintended amino-acid changes, (ii) optimize multiple, biologically relevant objectives, and (iii) retain computational efficiency. However, existing methods are forced to trade off between these perspectives, forming an "impossible triangle." We present RNop, a knowledge-infused Transformer that integrates mechanism-aligned losses to address this problem. By encoding biological prior knowledge in losses, RNop makes knowledge infusion explicit and controllable across optimization focus. Trained on over 6 million sequences, in silico analyses show RNop resolves the "impossible triangle" of mRNA optimization with absolute sequence fidelity, significantly improved biological metrics, and high throughput. In in vitro validation, it can deliver up to 2.28-fold expression gain. Ablation studies reveal how each prior contributes to targeted improvements, yielding mechanism-level interpretability. RNop represents a shift in mRNA optimization methodology: by infusing explicit and interpretable knowledge, the "black-box" mRNA design can be transformed into a predictable, explainable engineering problem. RNop is designed as an extensible platform: additional biological priors can be incorporated as modular, mechanism-aligned loss functions, enabling future development and adaptation to related sequence design problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zheng Gong, Ziyi Jiang, Weihao Gao, Yuanyuan Wang, Zhining Cai, Deng Zhuo, Lan Ma. 2026-08-30. mRNA Design and Optimization with Deep Knowledge-Infused Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23862

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SCALE:Scalable Conditional Atlas-Level Endpoint transport for virtual cell perturbation prediction

Virtual-cell models aim to predict how cell populations respond to perturbations, but control and treated cells are measured as unpaired populations, complicating the learning of perturbation-specific effects. We present SCALE, a conditional transport model that represents cells as unordered sets and predicts treated populations without cell-level matching. A shared set-aware encoder and conditional DiT backbone learn latent transport, making endpoint supervision directly delta-aligned without an auxiliary delta objective. Across genetic, chemical, developmental and immune perturbations, SCALE recovered gene-expression changes, response directions and population structure. In CRISPR data with dominant cell-line effects, SCALE outperformed competing methods across seven metrics and maintained separation among gene-target representations rather than collapsing them into a shared region. SCALE further prioritized cytokines predicted to produce distinct immune activation and inflammatory responses. Experiments using matched PBMC samples from three donors confirmed these predicted differences. Together, SCALE enables perturbation-specific prediction from unpaired populations and supports experimental prioritization.

cs.LG

Propensity Straight-Through Gradients for Discrete Stochastic Systems

Continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) provide the backbone for modeling discrete stochastic dynamics across applied, physical, and biological sciences. Their integration with modern gradient-based machine learning, however, is limited by the hard categorical event selection intrinsic to Gillespie-type simulation algorithms. We exploit the affine state update to obtain the exact one-step conditional-mean sensitivity by differentiating normalized reaction propensities. We pair this backward rule with exact forward trajectories to define the propensity straight-through (PST) estimator. At the trajectory level, we show that one-step sensitivities composed across events can depart from the exact multistep sensitivity. We derive the resulting per-step discrepancy in closed form and prove that it vanishes identically for affine downstream dependence. PST matches the accuracy of Gumbel-Softmax straight-through across all benchmarks: reversible dimerization (0.06% error), a genetic oscillator (1.7% error), a 50-task repressilator suite (0.17% median error), and patch-clamp ion-channel recordings ($R^2$ = 0.988). Under matched settings, PST converges 3.0-fold faster on the oscillator and 2.1-fold faster on the ion channel. At deep-learning scale, PST trains a 203,796-parameter stochastic reaction network with hard sampling, reaching 98.22% MNIST digit classification accuracy. By differentiating an exact conditional mean rather than a relaxed sample, PST offers a temperature- and Gumbel-free path to scalable gradient-based learning through exact stochastic trajectories.

q-bio.QM

Benchmarking Peptide-Protein Affinity Prediction Across Peptide and Target Shifts

Peptide-protein affinity models are often evaluated with a single data split, obscuring whether they interpolate among measurements for observed targets or generalize across peptide or target shifts. We integrated three sources of quantitative peptide-protein binding data to obtain 11,349 deduplicated pairs and benchmarked ten peptide representations, ESM-2 protein embeddings, and six regressors under peptide-similarity, within-target, and leave-target-out partitions. Across 60 matched representation-regressor configurations, mean test Spearman correlations were 0.462, 0.669, and 0.530, respectively. The top configuration shifted from ECFP-16 count fingerprints with random forest in the first two settings to HELM-BERT with Extra Trees when exact target sequences were excluded. Representation-rank correlations ranged from -0.042 to 0.624 across partitions, whereas regressor-rank correlations ranged from 0.771 to 0.943. Learning curves showed that representation differences were largest with limited supervision and narrowed as training data increased. PeptideCLM-2 adaptation and simple element-wise interaction features provided no consistent gain over a frozen encoder and direct concatenation under the tested protocols. These conclusions are specific to a dataset that pools transformed Kd, Ki, and IC50 measurements and to target exclusion at the exact-sequence level. Peptide-protein affinity benchmarks should therefore align data partitions with the intended use and jointly assess the effects of data scale, molecular representation, and downstream learner.

cs.LG