Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2506.23087

The Grothendieck duality and sparse minimizing in spaces of Sobolev solutions to elliptic systems

Abstract

We present an instructive example of using Banach spaces of solutions to (linear, generally, non-scalar) elliptic operator $A$ to investigate variational inverse problems related to neural networks and/or to regularization of solutions to boundary value problems. More precisely, inspired by kernel's method for optimization problems in locally convex spaces, we prove the existence of the so-called sparse minimizers for the related variational problem and produce a representer theorem where a suitable fundamental solution of the operator $A$ is used as a reproducing kernel. The Grothendieck type duality for the Sobolev spaces of solutions to elliptic operator $A$ plays an essential role in the considerations. The case where the number of data passes to infinity is also discussed. Some typical situations related to the standard elliptic operators, the corresponding function spaces and fundamental solutions are considered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Shlapunov, Alexander Polkovnikov, Kseniya Gagelgans. 2025-06-29. The Grothendieck duality and sparse minimizing in spaces of Sobolev solutions to elliptic systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23087

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A linear test approach to global controllability of third- and fifth-order nonlinear dispersive equations

We investigate third- and fifth-order nonlinear dispersive equations of KdV type on the torus and establishes approximate controllability by a fixed four-dimensional control; rather than relying solely on the saturation machinery, the analysis exploits the finite-dimensional controllability of the inviscid Burgers equation linearized around a carefully constructed return trajectory, with the trajectory itself obtained from an observable family. This ``linear test" strategy, yields more information about the structure of the control than the standard approach. In particular, the constructed control is shown to depend continuously on the initial and target states, a property that is by no means automatic in nonlinear control problems, and to decompose as a bounded linear operator applied to the data plus a fixed remainder, with the operator part interestingly independent of the order of dispersion.

math.AP

A conditional Lagrangian clock barrier at the $C^{1,\frac{1}{3}}$ threshold for axisymmetric Euler without swirl

We consider axisymmetric no-swirl solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, with initial velocity in $C^{1,α}\cap L^2$, where $α\in\left[\frac{1}{3},1\right)$. In a major breakthrough, Shkoller introduced a clock-and-driver framework that he used in order to prove finite-time type I blow-up below the $C^{1,\frac{1}{3}}$ threshold in this setting. Motivated by this, we define Lagrangian classes of coherent conditional solutions for which the same mechanism yields a supercritical-critical barrier to blow-up when $α\geq\frac{1}{3}$. When $α>\frac{1}{3}$, the aforementioned barrier is genuinely depleted, whereas at the critical endpoint $α=\frac{1}{3}$, we obtain an exponential bound preventing blow-up. In the general case, we formulate a matrix-clock criterion in terms of the smallest singular value of the deformation gradient and show that, under transverse cusp-tail, longitudinal, off-clock, Dini, and suitable geometric coherence hypotheses, this singular value cannot collapse in finite time. In particular, we also show that the class of such coherent solutions includes the smooth ones locally in time. In the on-axis case, the criterion reduces to the scalar clock inequality $\displaystyle \dot{J}(t)\gtrsim -B(t)J(t)-CJ(t)^{3α}$, which rules out Shkoller-type clock collapse for $α\geq\frac{1}{3}$. These results do not enlarge the known Lorentz-space global regularity classes. Rather, they in particular identify the supercritical Lagrangian obstruction dual to Shkoller's subcritical blow-up mechanism in the case $α>\frac{1}{3}$.

math.AP