Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.09660

Tools and Methodologies for System-Level Design

Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya·Marilyn Wolf
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

System-level design, once the province of board designers, has now become a central concern for chip designers. Because chip design is a less forgiving design medium -- design cycles are longer and mistakes are harder to correct -- system-on-chip designers need a more extensive tool suite than may be used by board designers and a variety of tools and methodologies have been developed for system-level design of systems-on-chips (SoCs). System-level design is less amenable to synthesis than are logic or physical design. As a result, system-level tools concentrate on modeling, simulation, design space exploration, and design verification. The goal of modeling is to correctly capture the system's operational semantics, which helps with both implementation and verification. The study of models of computation provides a framework for the description of digital systems. Not only do we need to understand a particular style of computation, such as dataflow, but we also need to understand how different models of computation can reliably communicate with each other. Design space exploration tools, such as hardware/software co-design, develop candidate designs to understand trade-offs. Simulation can be used not only to verify functional correctness but also to supply performance and power/energy information for design analysis. This chapter employs two applications -- video and neural networks -- as examples. Both are leading-edge applications that illustrate many important aspects of system-level design.

Explore related subjects

cs.AR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya, Marilyn Wolf. 2025-07-13. Tools and Methodologies for System-Level Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09660

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A System Architecture for Low Latency Multiprogramming Quantum Computing

As quantum systems scale, multiprogramming quantum computing (MPQC) provides a practical way to improve device utilization and throughput. However, because quantum executables are device-dependent, non-portable across qubit regions, and highly susceptible to noise and crosstalk, current MPQC pipelines rely on expensive online compilation to co-optimize concurrently running programs. This online step dominates runtime and impedes low-latency deployments for practical, real-world workloads in the future, such as repeatedly invoked quantum neural network (QNN) services. We present FLAMENCO, a fidelity-aware multi-version compilation system that enables independent offline compilation and low-latency multiprogramming at runtime. \textbf{At the architecture level}, the system abstracts devices into compute units to reduce the search space of region allocation. \textbf{At compile time}, it generates diverse executable versions for each program---each bound to a distinct qubit region---allowing dynamic region selection at runtime and overcoming non-portability. \textbf{At runtime}, it employs a lightweight orchestrator that uses post-compilation fidelity metrics to avoid conflicts and mitigate crosstalk, supporting conflict-free co-execution without online co-optimization. Evaluations show that FLAMENCO achieves over 5$\times$ runtime speedup in post-scheduling execution while maintaining comparable execution fidelity on common-success workloads. When integrated into existing scheduler-coupled systems, it raises workload-level conflict-free orchestration ratio from 0.183 to 1.000 for HyperQ and from 0.050 to 0.400 for QOS.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

HBFSim: Fast and Faithful Simulation of High-Bandwidth Flash Under Real GPU Execution

High-Bandwidth Flash (HBF) places high-capacity NAND beside HBM to relieve the memory-capacity bottleneck of LLM inference, yet its system-level behavior cannot be evaluated before hardware becomes available. Cycle-level GPU simulators are too slow for production-scale models. Trace replay has a further shortcoming: it cannot capture the allocation, migration, and execution changes induced by different HBM-HBF configurations. Our key insight is that HBF need not be evaluated by simulating the GPU: only the program-visible effects of HBF need to be modeled. And only a real LLM workload running on real hardware can answer the arguments about HBF. Hence the modeled service has to be injected into that running program, and the injection must not destroy the GPU concurrency that would hide the original I/O latency. We present HBFSim, an open-source HBF simulator that executes LLM workloads on a real GPU while modeling HBF timing, thermal, and other behaviors online. HBFSim rewrites the PTX of the workload's kernels and routes accesses inside a registered address range into the HBF simulator. It supports asynchronous TMA transfers and capacities beyond physical GPU memory. HBFSim leaves the model's run unaffected across ordinary-memory, TMA, and capacity-mode tests. The delay it injects matches the delay requested to within 0.152%. We also design a coupled thermal module that puts HBF, HBM, and the GPU in one advanced package, which is important for answering how severe the hot throttling problem becomes after HBF runs for a long time. Experiments with Qwen3-30B show how package heating, HBM-HBF allocation, and shared MoE demand jointly constrain the design space of future HBF accelerators.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

Bio-inspired Learning and Decision-Making with Probabilistic In-Memory Computing Hardware: Part 2

This report extends our previous work (Part 1), which introduced an energy-based model for learning and decision-making under uncertainty. The model leverages stochastic Langevin dynamics to continuously evolve approximate probability distributions over neuron states and model weights. However, as noted in Part 1 and confirmed through GPU-based implementations, large-scale probabilistic energy-based models of this nature face significant scalability challenges due to excessive execution latency. This latency stems from a fundamental mismatch: massively parallel models with low arithmetic intensity (such as energy-based models) are being executed on processor architectures like GPUs that rely on high-bandwidth memory (HBM) interfaces. The HBM imposes brutally sequential execution constraints on inherently parallelizable models, creating the false impression that such models are unscalable. In reality, it is the GPU architecture itself, with its dependence on HBM interfaces, that is not a scalable processor architecture for this class of AI model. In this report, we demonstrate using a detailed transaction-level model (TLM) of a probabilistic analogue in-memory computing (AIMC) processor that the same energy-based model can execute well over 1000x faster than data-center-grade hardware by eliminating the HBM interface and performing computation directly within on-chip memory.

cs.AR↗