Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2507.11783

EEG Foundation Models: A Critical Review of Current Progress and Future Directions

Abstract

Premise. Patterns of electrical brain activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) offer immense value for scientific and clinical investigations. The inability of supervised EEG encoders to learn robust EEG patterns and their over-reliance on expensive signal annotations have sparked a transition towards general-purpose self-supervised EEG encoders, i.e., EEG foundation models (EEG-FMs), for robust and scalable EEG feature extraction. However, the real-world readiness of early EEG-FMs and the rubrics for long-term research progress remain unclear. Objective. In this work, we conduct a review of ten early EEG-FMs to capture common trends and identify key directions for future development of EEG-FMs. Methods. We comparatively analyze each EEG-FM using three fundamental pillars of foundation modeling, namely the representation of input data, self-supervised modeling, and the evaluation strategy. Based on this analysis, we present a critical synthesis of EEG-FM methodology, empirical findings, and outstanding research gaps. Results. We find that most EEG-FMs adopt a sequence-based modeling scheme that relies on transformer-based backbones and the reconstruction of masked temporal EEG sequences for self-supervision. However, model evaluations remain heterogeneous and largely limited, making it challenging to assess their practical off-the-shelf utility. In addition to adopting standardized and realistic evaluations, future work should demonstrate more substantial scaling effects and make principled and trustworthy choices throughout the EEG representation learning pipeline. Significance. Our review indicates that the development of benchmarks, software tools, technical methodologies, and applications in collaboration with domain experts may advance the translational utility and real-world adoption of EEG-FMs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gayal Kuruppu, Neeraj Wagh, Vaclav Kremen, Sandipan Pati, Gregory Worrell, Yogatheesan Varatharajah. 2025-12-24. EEG Foundation Models: A Critical Review of Current Progress and Future Directions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards optimal algorithms for the recovery of low-dimensional models with linear rates

We consider the problem of recovering elements of a low-dimensional model from linear measurements. From signal and image processing to inverse problems in data science, this question has been at the center of many applications. Lately, with the success of models and methods relying on deep neural networks, there has been a multiplication of different algorithms and recovery results. Comparing the performance of recovery algorithms becomes a complex task without a unifying framework. In this article, as a first step for the study of general algorithms for low-dimensional recovery, we study a class of generalized projected gradient descent algorithms that can recover a given low-dimensional model with linear rates. The obtained rates decouple the impact of the quality of the measurements with respect to the model from the geometry of the properties of the chosen generalized projection: we can directly measure performance through a restricted Lipschitz constant of the projection with respect to the low dimensional model. By optimizing this constant, we define an optimal generalized projected gradient descent. Our general approach provides an optimality result in the case of sparse recovery. Moreover, our framework allows for a common interpretation of linear rates of recovery in the context of both sparse models and models induced by some ``plug-and-play'' imaging methods that rely on deep neural networks. These rates of recovery are observed in experiments on synthetic and real data.

eess.SP

Tracking Driving Stressors through Multimodal Physiological Monitoring

Understanding and mitigating driving stress is important for improving road safety and driver well-being. Reliable estimation, however, requires distinguishing biobehavioral responses to individual stressors from gradual physiological and contextual changes. We collected physiological data and vehicle telemetry from 31 participants across 44 simulated-driving sessions containing controlled stressor events. Under cross-validation, a multimodal classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.768 when distinguishing the stressor phase from an earlier baseline, reflecting both stressor effects and temporal drift. Controlling for drift retained an AUROC of 0.661, but revealed stronger responses to sustained than brief stressors, and shifted feature attribution toward phasic cardiac and electrodermal markers. We further quantified the interaction between model-estimated physiological stress and observable changes in vehicle control through simulation telemetry. Our findings show that stressor-aware modeling can identify physiologically grounded responses that correspond to meaningful changes in driving behavior.

eess.SP

Resolution-Aliasing Trade-off in Near-Field Localisation

Extremely Large-scale MIMO (XL-MIMO) systems operating in Near-Field (NF) introduce new degrees of freedom for accurate source localisation, but make dense arrays impractical. Sparse or distributed arrays can reduce hardware complexity while maintaining high resolution, yet sub-Nyquist spatial sampling introduces aliasing artefacts in the localisation ambiguity function. This paper presents a unified framework to jointly characterise resolution and aliasing in NF localisation and study the trade-off between the two. Leveraging the concept of local chirp spatial frequency, we derive analytical expressions linking array geometry and sampling density to the spatial bandwidth of the received field. We introduce two geometric tools--Critical Antenna Elements (CAEs) and the Non-Contributive Zone (NCZ)--to intuitively identify how individual antennas contribute to resolution and/or aliasing. Our analysis reveals that resolution and aliasing are not always strictly coupled, e.g., increasing the array aperture can improve resolution without necessarily aggravating aliasing. These results provide practical guidelines for designing NF arrays that optimally balance resolution and aliasing, supporting efficient XL-MIMO deployment.

eess.SP