Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.00212

Reinitializing weights vs units for maintaining plasticity in neural networks

J. Fernando Hernandez-Garcia·Shibhansh Dohare·Jun Luo·Rich S. Sutton
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Loss of plasticity is a phenomenon in which a neural network loses its ability to learn when trained for an extended time on non-stationary data. It is a crucial problem to overcome when designing systems that learn continually. An effective technique for preventing loss of plasticity is reinitializing parts of the network. In this paper, we compare two different reinitialization schemes: reinitializing units vs reinitializing weights. We propose a new algorithm, which we name \textit{selective weight reinitialization}, for reinitializing the least useful weights in a network. We compare our algorithm to continual backpropagation and ReDo, two previously proposed algorithms that reinitialize units in the network. Through our experiments in continual supervised learning problems, we identify two settings when reinitializing weights is more effective at maintaining plasticity than reinitializing units: (1) when the network has a small number of units and (2) when the network includes layer normalization. Conversely, reinitializing weights and units are equally effective at maintaining plasticity when the network is of sufficient size and does not include layer normalization. We found that reinitializing weights maintains plasticity in a wider variety of settings than reinitializing units.

Explore related subjects

cs.NEcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. Fernando Hernandez-Garcia, Shibhansh Dohare, Jun Luo, Rich S. Sutton. 2025-08-20. Reinitializing weights vs units for maintaining plasticity in neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Genetic Programming with Behaviour-based Niching for Learning Guided Local Search in Vehicle Routing Problems

Genetic Programming Guided Local Search (GPGLS) learns utility functions that guide local search for vehicle routing. Its evolving programs can have similar fitness while inducing different search behaviour, making fitness alone an incomplete basis for population diversity management. We propose GPGLS with Behaviour-based Niching (BN-GPGLS), which characterises programs through six operator-level descriptors collected during local search. A current-generation archive selects fitness-competitive, compact representatives from strata of a behaviour score. Fixed policies use archive parents continuously, whereas adaptive policies activate them using training-fitness and standardised behaviour-dispersion signals, optionally with a tree-size condition. We compare four behaviour-based variants with a no-archive GPGLS control and fitness-based niching over 30 seed-matched runs on generated 200-customer instances. BN-Adaptive achieves the best descriptive average rank on a separate 90-instance monitoring set; aggregate routing-cost differences are small. All five archive policies produce lower final-population median tree sizes than the GPGLS control, with paired Wilcoxon comparisons remaining significant after Holm adjustment. These results identify useful solution-quality and program-size trade-offs within the evaluated setting, without attributing the size reductions to behaviour representation alone.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

DCL-GPGLS: Dynamic Curriculum Learning for Genetic Programming Guided Local Search in Large-Scale Vehicle Routing

Genetic Programming Guided Local Search (GPGLS) uses genetic programming to evolve utility functions for guided local search in large-scale vehicle routing problems (LSVRPs). Evaluating every GP individual on every training instance at every generation is expensive, so GPGLS is usually trained on small instance batches. Existing curriculum-based GPGLS orders these batches mainly by instance size. Adaptive Curriculum Learning GPGLS (ACL-GPGLS) improves training efficiency by adapting when the search moves between fixed curriculum stages, but the instance difficulty order remains predefined. We propose DCL-GPGLS, which estimates the difficulty of each training instance from the current population's solution quality and updates the estimates during evolution. Each generation then receives a batch near a scheduled difficulty level, with a correction that limits repeated selection of the same instances. Experiments on a fixed training-test split of the CVRPLIB X set show that DCL-GPGLS achieves the best observed average rank and mean test cost among six training policies. It obtains the lowest mean cost on 36 of 65 unseen test instances and is significantly better than the static feedback-derived curriculum, matched in total evaluator calls, on 6 instances, with no significant difference on the remaining 59.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

Online Automated Algorithm Design with Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) enable automated algorithm design (AAD) through reasoning and code synthesis. However, most existing LLM-based AAD methods separate algorithm design from target optimization, deploying a fixed design even as the optimization state evolves. Conventional adaptive optimizers can respond to such changes, but their adjustments remain confined to predefined parameters, operators, or strategies. To address these limitations, we introduce online LLM-based AAD, a novel optimization paradigm that treats the algorithm itself as a state-dependent decision variable. At each stage, LLM agents synthesize an algorithm with new behavior logic from the current optimization state. Executing the generated algorithm advances the search and provides feedback for subsequent designs, coupling algorithm design with target optimization without requiring a separate offline algorithm pretraining stage. To implement this paradigm, we propose OnDesign, a multi-agent framework that reconciles competing design perspectives to synthesize executable algorithms and uses execution feedback to refine how runtime evidence is interpreted for subsequent designs. We evaluate OnDesign across two mainstream black-box optimization paradigms on three scenarios: Bayesian optimization, evolutionary continuous optimization, and evolutionary mixed-variable optimization. Extensive experiments on six benchmark suites and one engineering problem across multiple problem dimensions demonstrate superior overall performance over conventional optimizers and offline LLM-based AAD methods.

cs.NE↗