Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.17281

Training the next generation of physicians for artificial intelligence-assisted clinical neuroradiology: ASNR MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2025 Lighthouse Challenge education platform

Raisa Amiruddin·Nikolay Y. Yordanov·Nazanin Maleki·Pascal Fehringer·Athanasios Gkampenis·Anastasia Janas·Kiril Krantchev·Ahmed Moawad·Fabian Umeh·Salma Abosabie·Sara Abosabie·Albara Alotaibi·Mohamed Ghonim·Mohanad Ghonim·Sedra Abou Ali Mhana·Nathan Page·Marko Jakovljevic·Yasaman Sharifi·Prisha Bhatia·Amirreza Manteghinejad·Melisa Guelen·Michael Veronesi·Virginia Hill·Tiffany So·Mark Krycia·Bojan Petrovic·Fatima Memon·Justin Cramer·Elizabeth Schrickel·Vilma Kosovic·Lorenna Vidal·Gerard Thompson·Ichiro Ikuta·Basimah Albalooshy·Ali Nabavizadeh·Nourel Hoda Tahon·Karuna Shekdar·Aashim Bhatia·Claudia Kirsch·Gennaro D'Anna·Philipp Lohmann·Amal Saleh Nour·Andriy Myronenko·Adam Goldman-Yassen·Janet R. Reid·Sanjay Aneja·Spyridon Bakas·Mariam Aboian
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

High-quality reference standard image data creation by neuroradiology experts for automated clinical tools can be a powerful tool for neuroradiology & artificial intelligence education. We developed a multimodal educational approach for students and trainees during the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation Lighthouse Challenge 2025, a landmark initiative to develop accurate brain tumor segmentation algorithms. Fifty-six medical students & radiology trainees volunteered to annotate brain tumor MR images for the BraTS challenges of 2023 & 2024, guided by faculty-led didactics on neuropathology MRI. Among the 56 annotators, 14 select volunteers were then paired with neuroradiology faculty for guided one-on-one annotation sessions for BraTS 2025. Lectures on neuroanatomy, pathology & AI, journal clubs & data scientist-led workshops were organized online. Annotators & audience members completed surveys on their perceived knowledge before & after annotations & lectures respectively. Fourteen coordinators, each paired with a neuroradiologist, completed the data annotation process, averaging 1322.9+/-760.7 hours per dataset per pair and 1200 segmentations in total. On a scale of 1-10, annotation coordinators reported significant increase in familiarity with image segmentation software pre- and post-annotation, moving from initial average of 6+/-2.9 to final average of 8.9+/-1.1, and significant increase in familiarity with brain tumor features pre- and post-annotation, moving from initial average of 6.2+/-2.4 to final average of 8.1+/-1.2. We demonstrate an innovative offering for providing neuroradiology & AI education through an image segmentation challenge to enhance understanding of algorithm development, reinforce the concept of data reference standard, and diversify opportunities for AI-driven image analysis among future physicians.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Raisa Amiruddin, Nikolay Y. Yordanov, Nazanin Maleki, Pascal Fehringer, Athanasios Gkampenis, Anastasia Janas, Kiril Krantchev, Ahmed Moawad, Fabian Umeh, Salma Abosabie, Sara Abosabie, Albara Alotaibi, Mohamed Ghonim, Mohanad Ghonim, Sedra Abou Ali Mhana, Nathan Page, Marko Jakovljevic, Yasaman Sharifi, Prisha Bhatia, Amirreza Manteghinejad, Melisa Guelen, Michael Veronesi, Virginia Hill, Tiffany So, Mark Krycia, Bojan Petrovic, Fatima Memon, Justin Cramer, Elizabeth Schrickel, Vilma Kosovic, Lorenna Vidal, Gerard Thompson, Ichiro Ikuta, Basimah Albalooshy, Ali Nabavizadeh, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Karuna Shekdar, Aashim Bhatia, Claudia Kirsch, Gennaro D'Anna, Philipp Lohmann, Amal Saleh Nour, Andriy Myronenko, Adam Goldman-Yassen, Janet R. Reid, Sanjay Aneja, Spyridon Bakas, Mariam Aboian. 2025-09-21. Training the next generation of physicians for artificial intelligence-assisted clinical neuroradiology: ASNR MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2025 Lighthouse Challenge education platform. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Analysis of Regularized Learning in Banach Spaces for Linear-functional Data

This article delves into the study of the theory of regularized learning in Banach spaces for linear-functional data. It encompasses discussions on representer theorems, pseudo-approximation theorems, and convergence theorems. Regularized learning is designed to minimize regularized empirical risks over a Banach space. The empirical risks are calculated by utilizing training data and multi-loss functions. The input training data are composed of linear functionals in a predual space of the Banach space to capture discrete local information from multimodal data and multiscale models. Through the regularized learning, approximations of the exact solution to an unidentified or uncertain original problem are globally achieved. In the convergence theorems, the convergence of the approximate solutions to the exact solution is established through the utilization of the weak* topology of the Banach space. The theorems of regularized learning are utilized in the interpretation of classical machine learning, such as support vector machines and artificial neural networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On Minimal Depth in Neural Networks

Understanding the relationship between the depth of a neural network and its representational capacity is a central problem in deep learning theory. In this work, we develop a geometric framework to analyze the expressivity of ReLU networks with the notion of depth complexity for convex polytopes. The depth of a polytope recursively quantifies the number of alternating convex hull and Minkowski sum operations required to construct it. This geometric perspective serves as a rigorous tool for deriving depth lower bounds and understanding the structural limits of deep neural architectures. We establish lower and upper bounds on the depth of polytopes, as well as tight bounds for classical families. These results yield two main consequences. First, we provide a purely geometric proof of the expressivity bound by Arora et al. (2018), confirming that $\lceil \log_2(n+1)\rceil$ hidden layers suffice to represent any continuous piecewise linear (CPWL) function. Second, we prove that, unlike general ReLU networks, convex polytopes do not admit a universal depth bound. Specifically, the depth of cyclic polytopes in dimensions $n \geq 4$ grows unboundedly with the number of vertices. This result implies that Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) cannot represent all convex CPWL functions with a fixed depth, revealing a sharp separation in expressivity between ICNNs and standard ReLU networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

DeepSPoC: A Deep Learning Based Sequential Propagation of Chaos

Classical particle methods based on propagation of chaos (PoC) have been developed for solving mean-field stochastic differential equations and their associated nonlinear Fokker--Planck equations. However, direct PoC implementations are difficult to apply to high-dimensional problems because they require simulating and storing large numbers of interacting particles, often with high particle-particle interaction costs. Motivated by these limitations, we build on the recently proposed sequential propagation of chaos (SPoC) framework, which replaces the fully interacting particle system in PoC with a sequential interaction mechanism. Based on this structure, we present DeepSPoC, a neural particle method that embeds a neural density representation into the sequential particle dynamics. DeepSPoC simulates particles batch by batch, while the neural network represents the evolving empirical law and is substituted into the coefficients of the mean-field SDE, thereby replacing direct particle-particle interactions with particle-network interactions. In DeepSPoC, a recently developed normalizing flow model called KRnet is used to approximate the empirical measure of particles. Compared with direct particle implementations, DeepSPoC substantially reduces memory consumption and evaluates interaction terms more efficiently, thereby improving scalability for high-dimensional problems. We apply DeepSPoC to a wide range of mean-field equations and verify its effectiveness and computational advantages.

cs.LG↗