Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.07204

Beyond the Oracle Property: Adaptive LASSO in Cointegrating Regressions with Local-to-Unity Regressors

Abstract

This paper derives new asymptotic results for the adaptive LASSO estimator in cointegrating regressions, allowing for uncertainty about whether the regressors are exact unit root processes. We study model selection probabilities, estimator consistency, and limiting distributions under standard and moving-parameter asymptotics. We further derive uniform convergence rates and the fastest local-to-zero rates detectable by the estimator under conservative and consistent tuning. For consistent tuning, we construct confidence regions that are easy to implement, uniformly valid over the parameter space, and achieve sure asymptotic coverage without requiring knowledge or estimation of local-to-unity or long-run covariance parameters. Simulation results reveal that the finite-sample distribution of the adaptive LASSO estimator can deviate substantially from the oracle property, whereas moving-parameter asymptotics provide much more accurate approximations. Consequently, in addition to being infeasible in applications due to their dependence on non-estimable nuisance parameters, oracle-based confidence regions are often too small to achieve adequate coverage in empirically relevant scenarios with small but non-zero coefficients. In contrast, the proposed confidence regions are always feasible and deliver reliable coverage across the parameter space. An empirical application to predicting the U.S. unemployment rate illustrates their practical usefulness for quantifying uncertainty around adaptive LASSO estimates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karsten Reichold, Ulrike Schneider. 2026-03-12. Beyond the Oracle Property: Adaptive LASSO in Cointegrating Regressions with Local-to-Unity Regressors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Difference-in-Differences with Unpoolable Data

Difference-in-differences (DID) is commonly used to estimate treatment effects but is infeasible in settings where data are unpoolable due to privacy concerns or legal restrictions on data sharing, particularly across jurisdictions. In this study, we identify and relax the assumption of data poolability in DID estimation. We propose an innovative approach to estimate DID with unpoolable data (UN-DID) which can accommodate covariates, multiple groups, and staggered adoption. Through analytical proofs and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that UN-DID and conventional DID estimates of the average treatment effect and standard errors are equal and unbiased in settings without covariates. With covariates, both methods produce estimates that are unbiased, equivalent, and converge to the true value. The estimates differ slightly but the statistical inference and substantive conclusions remain the same. Two empirical examples with real-world data further underscore UN-DID's utility. The UN-DID method allows the estimation of cross-jurisdictional treatment effects with unpoolable data, enabling better counterfactuals to be used and new research questions to be answered.

econ.EM

The Promise of Time-Series Foundation Models for Agricultural Forecasting: Evidence from Commodity Prices

Forecasting agricultural markets remains challenging due to nonlinear dynamics, structural breaks, and sparse data. A long-standing belief holds that simple time-series methods outperform more advanced alternatives. This paper provides the first systematic evidence that this belief no longer holds with modern time-series foundation models (TSFMs). Using USDA ERS monthly commodity price data from 1997-2025, we evaluate 17 forecasting approaches across four model classes, including traditional time-series, machine learning, deep learning, and five state-of-the-art TSFMs (Chronos, Chronos-2, TimesFM 2.5, Time-MoE, Moirai-2), and construct annual marketing year price predictions to compare with USDA's futures-based season-average price (SAP) forecasts. We show that zero-shot foundation models consistently outperform traditional time-series methods, machine learning, and deep learning architectures trained from scratch in both monthly and annual forecasting. Furthermore, foundation models remarkably outperform USDA's futures-based forecasts on three of four major commodities despite USDA's information advantage from forward-looking futures markets. Time-MoE delivers the largest accuracy gains, achieving 54.9% improvement on wheat and 18.5% improvement on corn relative to USDA ERS benchmarks on recent data (2017-2024 excluding COVID). These results point to a paradigm shift in agricultural forecasting.

econ.EM

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM