Sensitivity Analysis for Treatment Effects in Difference-in-Differences Models using Riesz Representation

Philipp Bach; Sven Klaassen; Jannis Kueck; Mara Mattes; Martin Spindler

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.09064

Sensitivity Analysis for Treatment Effects in Difference-in-Differences Models using Riesz Representation

Philipp Bach·Sven Klaassen·Jannis Kueck·Mara Mattes·Martin Spindler

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is one of the most popular approaches for empirical research in economics, political science, and beyond. Identification in these models is based on the conditional parallel trends assumption: In the absence of treatment, the average outcome of the treated and untreated group are assumed to evolve in parallel over time, conditional on pre-treatment covariates. We introduce a novel approach to sensitivity analysis for DiD models that assesses the robustness of DiD estimates to violations of this assumption due to unobservable confounders, allowing researchers to transparently assess and communicate the credibility of their causal estimation results. Our method focuses on estimation by Double Machine Learning and extends previous work on sensitivity analysis based on Riesz Representation in cross-sectional settings. We establish asymptotic bounds for point estimates and confidence intervals in the canonical $2\times2$ setting and group-time causal parameters in settings with staggered treatment adoption. Our approach makes it possible to relate the formulation of parallel trends violation to empirical evidence from (1) pre-testing, (2) covariate benchmarking and (3) standard reporting statistics and visualizations. We provide extensive simulation experiments demonstrating the validity of our sensitivity approach and diagnostics and apply our approach to two empirical applications.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Philipp Bach, Sven Klaassen, Jannis Kueck, Mara Mattes, Martin Spindler. 2025-10-10. Sensitivity Analysis for Treatment Effects in Difference-in-Differences Models using Riesz Representation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Inference for Treatment Effects Conditional on Generalized Principal Strata using Instrumental Variables

We propose a general approach to inference for a broad class of models that arise in the analysis of treatment effects with discrete-valued treatments and instruments and a general-valued outcome. In addition to instrument exogeneity, the main substantive assumption in our class of models rules out certain response types by assuming that they occur with probability zero. Here, the response type refers to the vector of potential outcomes and potential treatments, and we refer to a set of possible values for the response type as a generalized principal stratum. Through a series of examples, we show that this framework encompasses a wide variety of assumptions that have been considered in the previous literature. Our framework allows inference on any treatment effect parameter that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. We develop methods for inference on such parameters under these assumptions, as well as methods for testing the validity of the assumptions themselves. A key result of our analysis is a characterization of the identified set for such parameters under these assumptions and the testable restrictions for the assumptions themselves in terms of existence of a nonnegative solution to linear systems of equations with a special structure. We propose methods for inference exploiting this special structure and recent results in Fang et al. (2023).

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Raking for estimation and inference in panel models with nonignorable attrition and refreshment

In panel data subject to nonignorable attrition, auxiliary (refreshment) sampling may restore full identification under weak assumptions on the attrition process. Despite their generality, these identification strategies have seen limited empirical use, largely because the implied estimation procedure requires solving a functional minimization problem for the target density. When the distributions of the observed data are parametric, we show that this problem can be solved using the iterative proportional fitting (raking) algorithm, which converges rapidly even with continuous data. The resulting density estimator is then used as input into a parametric moment condition. We establish consistency and convergence rates for both the raking-based density estimator and the resulting moment estimator. We also derive a simple recursive procedure for estimating the asymptotic variance. Finally, we demonstrate the satisfactory performance of our estimator in simulations and provide an empirical illustration using data from the Understanding America Study panel.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Summary Indices in Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper studies the practice of combining multiple outcomes into a summary index to estimate a causal effect. For common estimators and index constructions, the estimate equals a weighted sum of the estimated effects on the components, with weights that are implicit and rarely reported. The paper derives the weights and shows that, for inverse-covariance-weighted indices, they can be negative and unrestricted in magnitude, so the index effect can have the opposite sign to every component effect. The paper proposes two procedures for valid inference on the index effect: a variance estimator that accounts for the data-dependent weights, and a shifted t-test that requires no such correction. Conventional t-tests of the null of no effect remain valid. Contrary to common claims, summary indices do not generally improve power. Three published studies illustrate the results.

econ.EM↗