Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.09429

The poset of maximal tubings of the cycle graph is a lattice

Ben Adenbaum·Emily Barnard·Max Hlavacek·Bryson Kagy·Nathan R. T. Lesnevich·George D. Nasr·Katie Waddle
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The poset of maximal tubings of a graph generalizes several well-known and remarkable partial orders. Notable examples include the weak Bruhat order and the Tamari lattice, posets of maximal tubings for the complete graph and the path graph, respectively. It is an open problem to characterize graphs for which the poset of maximal tubings is a lattice. In this paper, we prove that the poset of maximal tubings for the cycle graph is a lattice, and moreover that it is semidistributive and congruence uniform. As main tools, we characterize all order relations in the poset, and introduce a useful map from maximal tubings of the cycle graph to maximal tubings of the path graph.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ben Adenbaum, Emily Barnard, Max Hlavacek, Bryson Kagy, Nathan R. T. Lesnevich, George D. Nasr, Katie Waddle. 2025-10-10. The poset of maximal tubings of the cycle graph is a lattice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗