Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.00352

Detecting AI-Generated Images via Diffusion Snap-Back Reconstruction: A Forensic Approach

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative image models has transformed digital media to the point where AI generated images can no longer be reliably distinguished from authentic photographs by human observers or many conventional detection methods. Modern text to image systems such as Stable Diffusion and DALL E can now generate images so realistic that they often appear completely natural, leaving little to no visible artifacts for traditional deepfake detectors to rely on. This challenge has practical consequences for misinformation control, institutional identity verification, and digital trust in political and legal contexts. Instead of searching for hidden pixel level traces, we take a different approach: we observe how an image responds when it is gently disturbed and reconstructed by a diffusion model. We call this behavior diffusion snap back. By tracking how perceptual similarity measures (LPIPS, SSIM, and PSNR) change across different reconstruction strengths, we capture compact and interpretable signals that reveal how closely an image aligns with the diffusion model's learned denoising behavior. Evaluated on a balanced dataset of 4,000 human and AI generated images, the proposed method achieves an AUROC of 0.993 under stratified five fold cross validation and 0.990 on a holdout split using only logistic regression. Initial robustness tests show that the method remains stable under common real world distortions such as image compression and added noise. Although our experiments were conducted using a single diffusion backbone, the results indicate that reconstruction behavior can serve as a reliable and scalable foundation for synthetic media detection as generative models continue to grow more realistic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mohd Ruhul Ameen, Akif Islam. 2026-03-09. Detecting AI-Generated Images via Diffusion Snap-Back Reconstruction: A Forensic Approach. https://doi.org/10.1109/qpain69676.2026.11545865

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV