Coping with Inductive Risk When Theories are Underdetermined: Decision Making with Partial Identification

Charles F. Manski

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.00355

Coping with Inductive Risk When Theories are Underdetermined: Decision Making with Partial Identification

Charles F. Manski

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Controversy about the significance of underdetermination of theories persists in the philosophy and conduct of science. The issue has practical import when research is used to inform decision making, because scientific uncertainty yields inductive risk. Seeking to enhance communication between philosophers and researchers who study public policy, this paper describes econometric analysis of partial identification and its use in welfare-economic policy analysis. Study of partial identification finds underdetermination and inductive risk to be highly consequential for credible prediction of important societal outcomes and, hence, for credible public decision making. It provides mathematical tools to characterize a broad class of scientific uncertainties that arise when available data and well-supported assumptions are combined to predict population outcomes. Combining study of partial identification with criteria for reasonable decision making under uncertainty yields coherent approaches to make policy choices without accepting one among multiple empirically underdetermined theories. The paper argues that study of partial identification warrants attention in philosophical discourse on underdetermination and inductive risk.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Charles F. Manski. 2026-04-08. Coping with Inductive Risk When Theories are Underdetermined: Decision Making with Partial Identification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Ordinal Distributional Change and Conservative Transition Benchmarks: Measurement, Identification, and Inference

Repeated cross-sections reveal changes in ordinal distributions but not the transitions producing them. I axiomatically characterize a threshold-weighted probability metric for ordinal change from threshold-crossing principles. For any threshold-additive ordinal geometry, the discrepancy coincides with the Wasserstein--1 distance induced by that ground metric and measures minimum displacement; its optimizing plans define conservative transition benchmarks. With missing outcomes, I derive sharp identified sets for the discrepancy and endpoint-conditioned benchmark plans. I develop finite-sample-valid projection inference using randomized Monte Carlo calibration and global search with an almost-sure convergence guarantee. Applied to Arab Barometer data, the framework documents a robust shift toward broader and more regular remittance receipt in Lebanon. The discrepancy interval remains well separated from zero after allowing for item nonresponse and sampling uncertainty, while benchmark bounds provide strong numerical evidence that least-displacement restructuring excludes movement toward less frequent receipt and requires reassignment from nonreceipt to recurrent receipt.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

A Stochastic Nested Fixed Point Algorithm for Large-Scale BLP Estimation

We develop a stochastic nested fixed point (SNFP) estimator for random coefficients logit demand models that updates model parameters using stochastic gradients and performs demand inversion one market at a time. Relative to the conventional nested fixed point (NFP) estimator, SNFP substantially reduces memory requirements and computational cost, making estimation feasible in very large datasets. We establish the large-$T$ (number of markets) asymptotic properties of the estimator under regularity conditions. We also characterize the effect of sharing one block of simulation draws across markets and show how to correct for it. Monte Carlo simulations show that the SNFP estimator achieves statistical accuracy comparable to the NFP estimator, and in our benchmark a single online pass estimates a model with 100 million markets in about 5.5 hours. An empirical application using scanner data further demonstrates the practical advantages of SNFP for large-scale demand estimation.

econ.EM↗