Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2602.05066

Bypassing AI Control Protocols via Agent-as-a-Proxy Attacks

Abstract

As AI agents automate critical workloads, they remain vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks. Current defenses rely on monitoring protocols that jointly evaluate an agent's Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and tool-use actions to ensure alignment with user intent. We demonstrate that these monitoring-based defenses can be bypassed via a novel Agent-as-a-Proxy attack, where prompt injection attacks treat the agent as a delivery mechanism, bypassing both agent and monitor simultaneously. While prior work on scalable oversight has focused on whether small monitors can supervise large agents, we show that even frontier-scale monitors are vulnerable. Large-scale monitoring models like Qwen2.5-72B can be bypassed by agents with similar capabilities, such as GPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B. On the AgentDojo benchmark, we achieve a high attack success rate against AlignmentCheck and Extract-and-Evaluate monitors under diverse monitoring LLMs. Our findings suggest current monitoring-based agentic defenses are fundamentally fragile regardless of model scale.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jafar Isbarov, Murat Kantarcioglu. 2026-02-25. Bypassing AI Control Protocols via Agent-as-a-Proxy Attacks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05066

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MobileCybench: Evaluating Agent Vulnerability Discovery via Executable Probes

AI agents now report vulnerabilities faster than maintainers can review them. Reports often depend on security properties specific to the application, and require considerable human labor to process. To mitigate this, we introduce a framework for evaluating vulnerability reports via probes, executable checks of security properties. A reported exploit is evaluated by replaying it against the application and running the probes: a triggered probe indicates both that the exploit succeeded and which security property it violated. As a probe encodes a security property rather than a known vulnerability, it can detect vulnerabilities that were not known when the probe was written. We instantiate the framework as MobileCybench, a benchmark for vulnerability discovery by AI agents in 13 Android applications, with 495 probes written and reviewed by the authors. We evaluate 5 coding agents (OpenCode with GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6-Sol, and GLM-5.2; Claude Code with Opus 4.8 and Opus 5) under 4 settings: as a malicious app on the victim's device or as a remote attacker with a low-privilege account, each with either only an obfuscated APK or access to the application's source code. Given only the obfuscated APK, the top agent, OpenCode with GPT-5.6-Sol, triggers probes in 53.8% of applications in the malicious-app setting and 16.7% in the remote-attacker setting. With source code, the trigger rate across all agents and both attack settings increases from 28.8% to 32.8%. Building and running the benchmark surfaced 23 previously unreported vulnerabilities, the majority of which have been confirmed by maintainers.

cs.CR

Powerful Primitives in the Bounded Quantum Storage Model

The bounded quantum storage model aims to achieve security against computationally unbounded adversaries that are restricted only with respect to their quantum memories. In this work, we provide information-theoretic secure constructions in this model for the following powerful primitives: (1) CCA1-secure symmetric key encryption, message authentication codes, and one-time programs. These schemes require no quantum memory for the honest user, while they can be made secure against adversaries with arbitrarily large memories by increasing the transmission length sufficiently. (2) CCA1-secure asymmetric key encryption, encryption tokens, signatures, signature tokens, and program broadcast. These schemes are secure against adversaries with roughly $e^{\sqrt{m}}$ quantum memory where $m$ is the quantum memory required for the honest user. All of the constructions additionally satisfy disappearing security, essentially preventing an adversary from storing and using a transmission later on.

cs.CR

BridgeShield: Risk-Aware Graph Modeling for Cross-Chain Bridge Attack Detection

Cross-chain bridges enable asset and state transfers across heterogeneous blockchains, but their complex cross-domain interactions introduce new attack surfaces that are difficult to monitor using traditional single-chain analysis methods. Existing approaches often focus on isolated on-chain behaviors and fail to capture the multi-stage execution semantics of cross-chain transactions. This paper presents BridgeShield, a graph-based framework for detecting cross-chain bridge attacks through risk-aware modeling of cross-chain execution behaviors. BridgeShield reconstructs cross-chain behavior graphs from execution traces and event logs, capturing interactions across the source chain, off-chain relay components, and the destination chain. To highlight attack-relevant structures, the framework employs differential meta-path selection to identify execution patterns that exhibit structural deviations between normal and attack transactions, and hierarchical risk propagation to aggregate distributed risk signals across interaction stages. Experiments on real-world bridge incidents show that BridgeShield achieves an F1-score of 92.6% in cross-chain attack detection and consistently outperforms existing rule-based and graph-based baselines. In addition, the model remains effective in detecting previously unseen attack incidents, indicating that BridgeShield captures structural risk patterns rather than memorizing historical attack templates.

cs.CR