Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2602.11298

Voxtral Realtime

Mistral-AI·:·Alexander H. Liu·Andy Ehrenberg·Andy Lo·Chen-Yo Sun·Guillaume Lample·Jean-Malo Delignon·Khyathi Raghavi Chandu·Patrick von Platen·Pavankumar Reddy Muddireddy·Rohin Arora·Sanchit Gandhi·Sandeep Subramanian·Soham Ghosh·Srijan Mishra·Abhinav Rastogi·Adrien Sadé·Alan Jeffares·Albert Jiang·Alexandre Cahill·Alexandre Gavaudan·Alexandre Sablayrolles·Amélie Héliou·Amos You·Andrew Bai·Angele Lenglemetz·Anmol Agarwal·Anton Eliseev·Antonia Calvi·Arjun Majumdar·Avi Sooriyarachchi·Baptiste Bout·Baptiste Rozière·Baudouin De Monicault·Benjamin Tibi·Charlotte Cronjäger·Clémence Lanfranchi·Connor Chen·Corentin Barreau·Corentin Sautier·Cyprien Courtot·Darius Dabert·Diego de las Casas·Elizaveta Demyanenko·Elliot Chane-Sane·Enguerrand Paquin·Etienne Goffinet·Fabien Niel·Faruk Ahmed·Federico Baldassarre·Gabrielle Berrada·Gaëtan Ecrepont·Gauthier Guinet·Genevieve Hayes·Georgii Novikov·Giada Pistilli·Guillaume Kunsch·Guillaume Martin·Guillaume Raille·Gunjan Dhanuka·Gunshi Gupta·Han Zhou·Harshil Shah·Hope McGovern·Hugo Thimonier·Indraneel Mukherjee·Irene Zhang·Jaeyoung Kim·Jan Ludziejewski·Jason Rute·Joachim Studnia·John Harvill·Jonas Amar·Joséphine Delas·Josselin Somerville Roberts·Julien Tauran·Karmesh Yadav·Kartik Khandelwal·Kilian Tep·Kush Jain·Laurence Aitchison·Laurent Fainsin·Léonard Blier·Lingxiao Zhao·Louis Martin·Lucile Saulnier·Luyu Gao·Maarten Buyl·Manan Sharma·Margaret Jennings·Marie Pellat·Mark Prins·Martin Alexandre·Mathieu Poirée·Mathilde Guillaumin·Matthieu Dinot·Matthieu Futeral·Maxime Darrin·Maximilian Augustin

Abstract

We introduce Voxtral Realtime, a natively streaming automatic speech recognition model that matches offline transcription quality at sub-second latency. Unlike approaches that adapt offline models through chunking or sliding windows, Voxtral Realtime is trained end-to-end for streaming, with explicit alignment between audio and text streams. Our architecture builds on the Delayed Streams Modeling framework, introducing a new causal audio encoder and Ada RMS-Norm for improved delay conditioning. We scale pretraining to a large-scale dataset spanning 13 languages. At a delay of 480ms, Voxtral Realtime achieves performance on par with Whisper, the most widely deployed offline transcription system. We release the model weights under the Apache 2.0 license.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mistral-AI, :, Alexander H. Liu, Andy Ehrenberg, Andy Lo, Chen-Yo Sun, Guillaume Lample, Jean-Malo Delignon, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Patrick von Platen, Pavankumar Reddy Muddireddy, Rohin Arora, Sanchit Gandhi, Sandeep Subramanian, Soham Ghosh, Srijan Mishra, Abhinav Rastogi, Adrien Sadé, Alan Jeffares, Albert Jiang, Alexandre Cahill, Alexandre Gavaudan, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Amélie Héliou, Amos You, Andrew Bai, Angele Lenglemetz, Anmol Agarwal, Anton Eliseev, Antonia Calvi, Arjun Majumdar, Avi Sooriyarachchi, Baptiste Bout, Baptiste Rozière, Baudouin De Monicault, Benjamin Tibi, Charlotte Cronjäger, Clémence Lanfranchi, Connor Chen, Corentin Barreau, Corentin Sautier, Cyprien Courtot, Darius Dabert, Diego de las Casas, Elizaveta Demyanenko, Elliot Chane-Sane, Enguerrand Paquin, Etienne Goffinet, Fabien Niel, Faruk Ahmed, Federico Baldassarre, Gabrielle Berrada, Gaëtan Ecrepont, Gauthier Guinet, Genevieve Hayes, Georgii Novikov, Giada Pistilli, Guillaume Kunsch, Guillaume Martin, Guillaume Raille, Gunjan Dhanuka, Gunshi Gupta, Han Zhou, Harshil Shah, Hope McGovern, Hugo Thimonier, Indraneel Mukherjee, Irene Zhang, Jaeyoung Kim, Jan Ludziejewski, Jason Rute, Joachim Studnia, John Harvill, Jonas Amar, Joséphine Delas, Josselin Somerville Roberts, Julien Tauran, Karmesh Yadav, Kartik Khandelwal, Kilian Tep, Kush Jain, Laurence Aitchison, Laurent Fainsin, Léonard Blier, Lingxiao Zhao, Louis Martin, Lucile Saulnier, Luyu Gao, Maarten Buyl, Manan Sharma, Margaret Jennings, Marie Pellat, Mark Prins, Martin Alexandre, Mathieu Poirée, Mathilde Guillaumin, Matthieu Dinot, Matthieu Futeral, Maxime Darrin, Maximilian Augustin. 2026-02-11. Voxtral Realtime. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11298

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI