Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2603.20270

FactorSmith: Agentic Simulation Generation via Markov Decision Process Decomposition with Planner-Designer-Critic Refinement

Abstract

Generating executable simulations from natural language specifications remains a challenging problem due to the limited reasoning capacity of large language models (LLMs) when confronted with large, interconnected codebases. This paper presents FactorSmith, a framework that synthesizes playable game simulations in code from textual descriptions by combining two complementary ideas: factored POMDP decomposition for principled context reduction and a hierarchical planner-designer-critic agentic workflow for iterative quality refinement at every generation step. Drawing on the factored partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) representation introduced by FactorSim [Sun et al., 2024], the proposed method decomposes a simulation specification into modular steps where each step operates only on a minimal subset of relevant state variables, limiting the context window that any single LLM call must process. Inspired by the agentic trio architecture of SceneSmith [Pfaff et al., 2025], FactorSmith embeds within every factored step a three-agent interaction: a planner that orchestrates workflow, a designer that proposes code artifacts, and a critic that evaluates quality through structured scoring, enabling iterative refinement with checkpoint rollback. This paper formalizes the combined approach, presents the mathematical framework underpinning context selection and agentic refinement, and describes the open-source implementation. Experiments on the PyGame Learning Environment benchmark demonstrate that FactorSmith generates simulations with improved prompt alignment, fewer runtime errors, and higher code quality compared to non-agentic factored baselines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Shamsaddinlou, Morteza NourelahiAlamdari. 2026-03-15. FactorSmith: Agentic Simulation Generation via Markov Decision Process Decomposition with Planner-Designer-Critic Refinement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Generating Interesting Scientific Ideas using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders

The rapid growth of scientific literature makes it increasingly challenging for researchers to identify novel and impactful ideas, especially across disciplines. Modern artificial intelligence (AI) systems offer new opportunities for scientific ideation, but how compelling are AI-generated ideas, and how can their quality be improved? Here, we introduce SciMuse, which generates personalized research ideas using a knowledge graph of 58 million papers and a large language model (LLM). A central focus of this work is to understand how interesting these ideas are. Therefore, we conducted a large-scale evaluation in which more than 100 research group leaders -- spanning the natural sciences to the humanities -- rated over 4,400 personalized ideas according to their level of interest. Overall, expert ratings were modest (mean 2.40 on a 5-point scale, most common rating 1), while 24.9% of ideas were rated 4 or 5. We find that supplying concept pairs selected using the knowledge graph does not improve expert-rated interest over a titles-only GPT baseline. High-citation-predicted pairs even showed a weak tendency (1.94$σ$) toward lower interest than random pairs. Nevertheless, graph features can be used to control properties of ideas, and, using this unique evaluation dataset, we show that idea interest can be predicted with both a supervised neural network based on graph features and a zero-shot ranking approach based on an LLM. Our work provides an AI methodology for generating scientific ideas and a large-scale interdisciplinary expert evaluation, paving the way to study and improve difficult-to-measure metrics such as expert-perceived scientific interestingness.

cs.AI↗

LOGIC: Efficient and Robust Contextual Biasing for Speech LLMs via Logit-Space Integration

Recognizing entity phrases remains a critical challenge for speech large language models. Existing prompting methods lack an explicit decoding-time biasing weight, limiting their controllability. Generative error correction methods can introduce hallucinated over-corrections. To address these limitations, we propose LOGIC (logit-space integration for contextual biasing), a robust framework operating directly in the logit space. By decoupling context injection from input processing, LOGIC enables explicit control over the biasing strength. Extensive experiments with an open-source speech large language model across 11 locales demonstrate that LOGIC achieves an average 9% relative reduction in entity word error rate, with an average false alarm rate increase of 0.3% and a 2.8% relative runtime overhead. When combined with prompting, LOGIC can reduce entity word error rate by 5% relative to the prompt-only method.

cs.AI↗

Decoding ML Decision: An Agentic Reasoning Framework for Large-Scale Ranking System

Modern large-scale ranking systems operate within a sophisticated landscape of competing objectives, operational constraints, and evolving product requirements. Progress in this domain is increasingly bottlenecked by the engineering context constraint: the arduous process of translating ambiguous product intent into reasonable, executable, verifiable hypotheses, rather than by modeling techniques alone. We present GEARS (Generative Engine for Agentic Ranking Systems), a framework that reframes ranking optimization as an autonomous discovery process within a programmable experimentation environment. Rather than treating optimization as static model selection, GEARS leverages Specialized Agent Skills to encapsulate ranking expert knowledge into reusable reasoning capabilities, enabling operators to steer systems via high-level intent vibe personalization. Furthermore, to ensure production reliability, the framework incorporates validation hooks to enforce statistical robustness and filter out brittle policies that overfit short-term signals. Experimental validation across diverse product surfaces demonstrates that GEARS consistently identifies superior, near-Pareto-efficient policies by synergizing algorithmic signals with deep ranking context while maintaining rigorous deployment stability.

cs.AI↗