arXiv · 2603.20593
Conflict Avoidance in Pedestrian Merging in Controlled Experiments by Variance Indicator
Abstract
Pedestrian congestion at corridor intersections often originates from localized fluctuations in motion rather than from a macroscopic collapse of flow. Understanding pedestrian instability at corridor intersections remains challenging because existing studies mainly rely on density, average speed, or flow-based measures and limited datasets, making it difficult to separate geometric turning effects from interaction induced fluctuations in merging flows. In particular, the mechanism underlying the turning angle dependence in T junctions has not been resolved. Here, we analyze more than 300 controlled experiments conducted in L corridors with turning only and T corridors with turning and merging. Using Voronoi-based speed variance $V_s$ and velocity variance $V_v$, we systematically compare geometric and interaction effects. $V_s$ effectively captures interaction driven instability, while $V_v$ reflects directional adjustments due to geometry. The comparison reveals distinct fluctuation mechanisms and identifies a critical transition near $90{\deg}$, demonstrating the advantage of variance-based indicators for diagnosing pedestrian dynamics.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jiawei Zhang, Xiaolu Jia, Sakurako Tanida, Claudio Feliciani, Daichi Yanagisawa, Katsuhiro Nishinari. 2026-03-21. Conflict Avoidance in Pedestrian Merging in Controlled Experiments by Variance Indicator. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20593
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.