Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.28329

Privacy as Commodity: MFG-RegretNet for Large-Scale Privacy Trading in Federated Learning

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed machine learning, yet two fundamental challenges hinder its large-scale adoption. First, gradient inversion attacks can reconstruct sensitive training data from uploaded model updates, so privacy risk persists even when raw data remain local. Second, without adequate monetary compensation, rational clients have little incentive to contribute high-quality gradients, limiting participation at scale. To address these challenges, a privacy trading market is developed in which clients sell their differential privacy budgets as a commodity and receive explicit economic compensation for privacy sacrifice. This market is formalized as a Privacy Auction Game (PAG), and the existence of a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium is established under dominant-strategy incentive compatibility (DSIC), individual rationality (IR), and budget feasibility. To overcome the NP-hard, high-dimensional Nash Equilibrium computation at scale, \textit{MFG-RegretNet} is introduced as a deep-learning-based auction mechanism that combines mean-field game (MFG) approximation with differentiable mechanism design. The MFG reduction lowers per-round computational complexity from $\mathcal{O}(N^2 \log N)$ to $\mathcal{O}(N)$ while incurring only an $\mathcal{O}(N^{-1/2})$ equilibrium approximation gap. Extensive experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 demonstrate that MFG-RegretNet outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in incentive compatibility, auction revenue, and social welfare, while maintaining competitive downstream FL model accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kangkang Sun, Jianhua Li, Xiuzhen Chen, Weizhi Meng, Minyi Guo. 2026-03-30. Privacy as Commodity: MFG-RegretNet for Large-Scale Privacy Trading in Federated Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28329

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT