Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.03301

Embedding-Only Uplink for Onboard Retrieval Under Shift in Remote Sensing

Sangcheol Sim
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Downlink bottlenecks motivate onboard systems that prioritize hazards without transmitting raw pixels. We study a strict setting where a ground station uplinks only compact embeddings plus metadata, and an onboard system performs vector search to triage new captures. We ask whether this embedding-only pipeline remains useful under explicit remote-sensing shift: cross-time (pre/post-event), cross-event/location (different disasters), cross-site cloud (15 geographic sites), and cross-city AOI holdout (buildings). Using OlmoEarth embeddings on a scaled public multi-task benchmark (27 Sentinel-2 L2A scenes, 15 cloud sites, 5 SpaceNet-2 AOIs; 10 seeds), we find that all effective methods rely on the same uplinked embeddings, but the optimal decision head is task-dependent: kNN retrieval is significantly superior for cloud classification (0.92 vs. centroid 0.91; p<0.01, Wilcoxon), while class centroids dominate temporal change detection (0.85 vs. retrieval 0.48; p<0.01). These results show that embedding-only uplink is the key enabler--once embeddings are onboard, the system can select the best head per task at no additional uplink cost, with all telemetry under 1 KB per query.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sangcheol Sim. 2026-03-30. Embedding-Only Uplink for Onboard Retrieval Under Shift in Remote Sensing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗