Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.15274

The Parameterized Complexity of Coloring Mixed Graphs

Abstract

A mixed graph contains (undirected) edges as well as (directed) arcs, thus generalizing undirected and directed graphs. A proper coloring $c$ of a mixed graph $G$ assigns a positive integer to each vertex such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$ for every edge $\{u,v\}$ and $c(u)<c(v)$ for every arc $(u,v)$ of $G$. As in classical coloring, the objective is to minimize the number of colors. Thus, mixed (graph) coloring generalizes classical coloring of undirected graphs and allows for more general applications, such as scheduling with precedence constraints, modeling metabolic pathways, and process management in operating systems; see a survey by Sotskov [Mathematics, 2020]. We initiate the systematic study of the parameterized complexity of mixed coloring. We focus on structural graph parameters that lie between cliquewidth and vertex cover, primarily with respect to the underlying undirected graph. Unlike classical coloring, which is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by treewidth or neighborhood diversity, we show that mixed coloring is W[1]-hard for treewidth and even paraNP-hard for neighborhood diversity. To utilize the directedness of arcs, we introduce and analyze natural generalizations of neighborhood diversity and cliquewidth to mixed graphs, and show that mixed coloring becomes FPT when parameterized by mixed neighborhood diversity. Further, we investigate how these parameters are affected if we add transitive arcs, which do not affect colorings. Finally, we provide tight bounds on the chromatic number of mixed graphs, generalizing known bounds on mixed interval graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antonio Lauerbach, Konstanty Junosza-Szaniawski, Marie Diana Sieper, Alexander Wolff. 2026-04-30. The Parameterized Complexity of Coloring Mixed Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15274

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC