Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2604.15644

The Impact of the Bar on Dense Gas and Star Formation in M83

Abstract

Although the relationship between molecular gas content and the star formation rate (SFR) has been extensively studied in nearby galaxies, it remains controversial whether the star formation efficiency (SFE) depends on galactic structure. In particular, whether the SFE is suppressed in the bar region compared with other structures, and the physical origin of this suppression, remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigate variations in the SFE and its physical drivers in the bar region of the nearby spiral galaxy M83, using multi-wavelength observations toward the bar and spiral arm regions on a scale of 200 pc observed with ALMA. From the molecular gas surface density derived from $^{12}$CO($J=2-1$) and $^{13}$CO($J=1-0$), the dense molecular gas surface density derived from HCN ($J = 1-0$), and the star formation rate surface density determined from extinction-corrected H$α$, we find that the SFEs in the bar region are roughly a factor of two lower than those in the spiral arm, indicating that the SFE is systematically suppressed in the bar. Moreover, we find that the SFEs of dense gas are lower in the bar than in the arm by a factor of about 0.35. These results suggest that not only the efficiency of converting bulk molecular gas into stars reduced in the bar, but the efficiency of star formation from dense gas is also lower. In addition, the CO line widths are systematically larger in the bar region and exhibit a negative correlation with both the SFE and the dense-gas SFE, consistent with the interpretation that enhanced turbulent motions hinder star formation. Although the analysis is limited to small regions of M83, our results suggest that the suppression of the SFE is related to large-scale dynamical effects on the molecular gas, such as strong shocks induced by cloud-cloud collisions and/or shear, both driven by non-circular motions in the bar.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianyi GU, Yoshimasa Watanabe. 2026-04-17. The Impact of the Bar on Dense Gas and Star Formation in M83. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj%2Fpsag054

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Entangling of Supernova Feedback Impacts with Coarsening Simulation Resolution

It is often understood that supernova (SN) feedback in galaxies is responsible for regulating star formation (SF) and generating gaseous outflows. However, a detailed look at the small-scale effects of SNe on the interstellar medium (ISM) in simulations shows that the macroscopic processes of SF suppression and outflow generation proceed in distinct channels. We demonstrate this finding in two independent simulations of isolated dwarf galaxies with very high (m_gas ~ Msun) numerical resolution, LYRA and RIGEL. Our findings suggest that the macroscopic effect of a given SN on the galaxy is best predicted by its local density. Outflows are driven by SNe in diffuse regions expanding to their cooling radii on large (~kpc) scales, while dense SF regions are disrupted in a localized (~pc) manner. However, these separate feedback channels are only distinguishable at very high resolutions capable of following mass scales \lesssim 10^2 \msun. When averaging on coarser scales, ISM densities are greatly mis-estimated, and variations between different SF and SNe-affected regions are severely washed out. It therefore cannot be __self-consistently__ determined, from coarse-resolution information __alone__, (1) whether a SN tends to contribute to outflows or direct SF suppression, and (2) the rate of SF in a given region. In particular, commonly used parameters in coarse-resolution (subgrid) models, such as the SN cooling radius and SF density threshold, may require more detailed treatments informed by high-resolution studies.

astro-ph.GA↗

Computational advances and challenges in simulations of turbulence and star formation

We review recent advances in the numerical modeling of turbulent flows and star formation. An overview of the most widely used simulation codes and their core capabilities is provided. We then examine methods for achieving the highest-resolution magnetohydrodynamical turbulence simulations to date, highlighting challenges related to numerical viscosity and resistivity. State-of-the-art approaches to modeling gravity and star formation are discussed in detail, including implementations of star particles and feedback from jets, winds, heating, ionization, and supernovae. We review the latest techniques for radiation hydrodynamics, including ray tracing, Monte Carlo, and moment methods, with comparisons between the flux-limited diffusion, moment-1, and variable Eddington tensor methods. The final chapter summarizes advances in cosmic-ray transport schemes, emphasizing their growing importance for connecting small-scale star formation physics with galaxy-scale evolution.

astro-ph.GA↗

How significant is the lensing interpretation of GW231123?

GW231123 is one of the most unusual gravitational-wave (GW) events, with exceptionally large inferred masses and near-extremal spins, offering an opportunity to test whether propagation effects contribute to these properties. We therefore examine whether the data support wave-optics microlensing embedded in a strong-lensing galaxy, whose detection becomes increasingly likely as observations accumulate, whether this interpretation can explain these properties, and how significant the preference remains under detector noise and waveform systematics. We compare six hypotheses: unlensed, isolated point mass, and embedded point-mass (EPM) and binary-lens (EB) effective models in Type-I (minimum) and Type-II (saddle) macro images. The EB Type-I model is most favored. For the most accurate waveform model NRSur7dq4, it gives $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=2.60$, versus $0.89$ for Type II, indicating sensitivity to macro-image geometry. Within Type I, however, the binary improves over the point mass by only $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm EPM-I}=0.16$ and $Δ\ln\mathcal{L}_{\max}=0.56$, providing no clear evidence for structure beyond a single effective perturber. Moreover, under embedded lensing, waveform-template discrepancies and inferred masses and spins are reduced. However, real O4a backgrounds from numerical-relativity injections show that the apparent lensing evidence is sensitive to waveform systematics and realistic detector noise: although the commonly used waveform IMRPhenomXPHM gives the largest Bayes factor, $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=4.52$, it is less exceptional relative to its own background, with a false-alarm probability of $6.5$--$8\%$, whereas NRSur7dq4 gives only $2$--$3\%$. Thus, waveform systematics can amplify apparent lensing evidence, but GW231123 remains an intriguing lensing candidate.

astro-ph.GA↗