And Quiet Does Not Flow the Don: Statistical Analysis of a Quarrel Between Nobel Prize Laureates

Nils Lid Hjort

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.19153

And Quiet Does Not Flow the Don: Statistical Analysis of a Quarrel Between Nobel Prize Laureates

Nils Lid Hjort

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Nobel Prize in literature 1965 was awarded Mikhail Sholokhov (1905-1984), for the epic novel Tikhij Don about Cossack life and the birth of a new Soviet society (And Quiet Flows the Don, or The Quiet Don, in different translations). Sholokhov has been compared to Tolstoy and was at least one and two generations ago called `the greatest of our writers' in the Soviet Union. In Russia alone his books have been published in more than a thousand editions, selling in total more than sixty million copies. He was an elected member of the USSR Supreme Soviet, the USSR Academy of Sciences, and of the CPSU Central Committee. But in the autumn of 1974 an article was published in Paris, Stremya `Tihogo Dona' (Zagadki romana (`The Rapids of Quiet Don: the Enigmas of the Novel'), by the author and critic D$^*$. He claimed that Tikhij Don was not at all Sholokhov's work, but that it rather was written by Fiodor Kriukov, a more obscure author who fought against bolshevism and died in 1920. The article was given credibility and prestige by none other than Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (a Nobel prize winner five years after Sholokhov), who wrote a preface giving full support to D$^*$'s conclusion. Scandals followed, also touching the upper echelons of Soviet society, and Sholokhov's reputation was faltering abroad (see e.g. Doris Lessing's (1997) comments; `vibrations of dislike instantly flowed between us'). Are we in fact faced with one of the most flagrant cases of plagiarism in the history of literature?

Explore related subjects

stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Nils Lid Hjort. 2026-04-21. And Quiet Does Not Flow the Don: Statistical Analysis of a Quarrel Between Nobel Prize Laureates. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online activity prediction via generalized Indian buffet process models

Online A/B tests are the standard tool for data-driven decision-making at scale. Among the design choices with the largest impact on statistical power is the triggering mechanism: how many users to expose and for how long. This often requires forecasting user engagement, i.e., whether enough users will trigger, and when a target participation level will be reached, from limited pilot data. We introduce a Bayesian nonparametric model for predicting both new-user counts and total triggers, accommodating the heavy-tailed engagement patterns typical of web experiments. All predictive quantities can be computed without intensive numerical procedures such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or variational inference. We evaluate on three public datasets (over 450 public benchmark evaluations) and a proprietary benchmark drawn from 759 production A/B tests comprising 1,774 arms. Across the benchmark analyses, our models are competitive and frequently improve accuracy in forecasting new users, total triggers, and time to reach a target sample size compared with state-of-the-art competitors, especially when only a few pilot days are observed.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Spending Scarce Confirmatory PET Measurements: Target-Aligned Validation in A4/LEARN

Anti-amyloid therapies and blood-based biomarkers are changing Alzheimer disease workups into a two-stage measurement workflow: screen broadly with cheaper information, then spend scarce confirmatory amyloid measurements where they support the decision that will be reported. Amyloid positron-emission tomography (PET) remains one such protocol measurement for amyloid burden, but PET slots, trial budgets, and payer-facing evidence packages are finite. This paper asks a deliberately operational question: when is simple transparent PET validation enough, and when is a fitted residual-uncertainty score worth the added complexity? For a weighted protocol target, the first-order value of validating subject i is the product of target influence and residual protocol uncertainty. Generic uncertainty sampling uses only the second factor and can spend PET measurements on subjects that are hard to predict but weak for the scientific, clinical, or commercial claim. We apply this rule to the A4/LEARN PET archive, treating observed PET as a design laboratory for scarce-confirmation studies. For the primary APOE4 carrier versus non-carrier contrast in Centiloid 24-or-higher PET positivity, simple APOE4-balanced validation recovers nearly all of the target-specific gain: at PET budget 200, the confidence-interval width ratio relative to random validation is 0.923 for APOE4 balancing and 0.914 for target-specific scoring, while generic uncertainty sampling is 0.980. Other targets behave differently: target-specific scoring gives larger gains for an age-slope analysis and for cutoff-indexed PET positivity. The practical message is simple: spend scarce protocol measurements according to the claim being validated, not only according to prediction uncertainty.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Identifying Damage Pathways Linking Sequence Composition to Storage Failure in DNA Data Storage via High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis

DNA data storage offers extraordinary information density and long-term durability, but its reliability is limited by sequence-dependent errors introduced during synthesis and accumulated during storage. It remains unclear how sequence composition is associated with storage failure through specific molecular damage components. We develop a high-dimensional semiparametric mediation framework for survival outcomes. GC content is treated as the exposure, a high-dimensional baseline damage spectrum (a vector of per-read damage counts stratified by trinucleotide context and error type) as the mediator, and storage-quality failure as the outcome. Nonlinear covariate effects in both the mediator and survival models are approximated using deep neural networks. A three-step procedure combining product-of-coefficients screening, Smoothly Clipped Absolute Deviation (SCAD) penalized estimation, and joint significance testing is developed for mediator selection and inference. Applied to an aging experiment on electrochemically synthesized DNA, the method identifies 14 significant mediators, all corresponding to single-base deletions, with estimated mediated effects concentrated in trinucleotide contexts ending in C. These results reveal deletion-type damage as a major pathway linking sequence composition to reduced archival reliability and suggest candidate sequence features for future optimization and error-control strategies. The proposed framework thus offers a mechanism-oriented statistical approach for understanding and improving the reliability of DNA data storage.

stat.AP↗