Deep Interest Mining for Intent-Enriched Semantic IDs in Multimodal Generative Recommendation

Yangchen Zeng; Jinze Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.20861

Deep Interest Mining for Intent-Enriched Semantic IDs in Multimodal Generative Recommendation

Yangchen Zeng·Jinze Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Semantic IDs (SIDs) provide the discrete item vocabulary used by generative recommendation, but their quality depends on what item evidence is preserved before quantization. In product recommendation, surface metadata often misses latent usage intent, visual evidence may be only weakly reflected in text, and downstream policy learning provides sparse feedback about whether a generated SID corresponds to a semantically useful item. We introduce \textbf{DeepInterestGR}, an intent-enriched SID framework for generative recommendation. Before SID quantization, \textbf{CMSA} enriches item representations through two complementary evidence paths: recommendation-oriented VLM captions and projected image embeddings. \textbf{DCIM} then uses an LLM to mine item-side intent descriptors -- latent usage motivations implied by product content rather than personalized user states. During policy training over the constructed SIDs, \textbf{QARM} adds a relevance-gated semantic-quality bonus on top of standard SID rewards, applying the bonus only when the generated SID decodes to the target item. Thus, semantic quality cannot reward a fluent but irrelevant item prediction. Experiments on three Amazon Product Review categories (Beauty, Sports, and Instruments) show that DeepInterestGR improves over competitive generative and RL-based baselines, with relative gains of up to \textbf{15.1\%} in NDCG@5 and \textbf{13.9\%} in NDCG@10 over the strongest per-metric baseline. Component ablations, CMSA branch analyses, reward variants, and SID-level case studies support a bounded claim: enriching pre-quantization item evidence with visual cues and item-side intent descriptors, together with relevance-gated semantic rewards, improves SID-based generative recommendation under the evaluated settings.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yangchen Zeng, Jinze Wang. 2026-06-01. Deep Interest Mining for Intent-Enriched Semantic IDs in Multimodal Generative Recommendation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20861

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Do Large Language Models Favor Recent Content? A Study on Recency Bias in LLM-Based Reranking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in information systems, including being used as second-stage rerankers in information retrieval pipelines, yet their susceptibility to recency bias has received little attention. We investigate whether LLMs implicitly favour newer documents by prepending artificial publication dates to passages in the TREC Deep Learning passage retrieval collections in 2021 (DL21) and 2022 (DL22). Across seven models, GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4, LLaMA-3 8B/70B, and Qwen-2.5 7B/72B, "fresh" passages are consistently promoted, shifting the Top-10's mean publication year forward by up to 4.78 years and moving individual items by as many as 95 ranks in our listwise reranking experiments. Although larger models attenuate the effect, none eliminate it. We also observe that the preference of LLMs between two passages with an identical relevance level can be reversed by up to 25% on average after date injection in our pairwise preference experiments. These findings provide quantitative evidence of a pervasive recency bias in LLMs and highlight the importance of effective bias-mitigation strategies.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

UniRec: Cross-stage Multi-Task Fusion with Preference Alignment for Cascaded Recommender Systems

Industrial recommender systems cascade stages with different objectives, feature spaces, and latency constraints. Optimizing pre-ranking and ranking separately induces cross-stage inconsistency: upstream models may filter out items preferred by downstream rankers, while independently tuned downstream fusion can offset upstream improvements. Most existing multi-task fusion methods target the ranking stage alone, and cross-stage methods often align with a downstream-derived score, leaving joint optimization of fusion modules across cascaded stages largely unexplored. We propose UniRec, a Unified Cross-stage Recommendation Fusion model. First, the two fusion agents partially share input embeddings in a single computation graph, allowing gradients from either stage to propagate through the shared representations. Second, a dual-axis preference alignment objective coordinates the two stages: horizontally, a compact aggregation term reorganizes dozens of pairwise objectives over heterogeneous prior signals into bidirectional preference evidence; vertically, a cross-stage consistency term transfers downstream pairwise preferences to the upstream fusion score. Third, we introduce attribute group-relative regularization, which computes relative advantages and normalizes policy updates within each attribute group, ensuring that uniformly promoting all items in a high-reward group provides no additional optimization gain. Offline experiments demonstrate UniRec consistently outperforms single-stage fusion and cross-stage coordination baselines; online A/B experiments show a 0.616% gain in app usage duration. UniRec has been fully deployed on the Kuaishou platform.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Scaling Articulated Rationales for MLLM-based Recommendation

We presented SARA, an industrial framework that transforms sparse articulated user rationales into scalable recommendation signals. Its data engine curates questionnaire responses into SARA-HQ, providing explicit preference supervision for aligning SARA-7B through SFT and Quality-Refining DPO. This alignment extends rationale generation from $86{,}564$ questionnaire-covered authors to the full $10$M-author space. SARA-Ranker translates the generated positive and negative rationales into features for user--author interaction modeling and negative-feedback history modeling, connecting articulated reasons to production ranking. Evaluation on unseen authors demonstrates that SARA-7B generates more specific, relevant, and grounded rationales than the evaluated general-purpose MLLMs. On top of a strong industrial ranking baseline with multimodal features, separate online A/B tests show that positive-rationale integration increases watch time by $0.99\%$, while negative-rationale integration reduces Hate feedback by $8.16\%$. Daily refresh and more than $30$ days of production deployment further demonstrate the operational feasibility of the approach. These findings establish articulated rationales as a useful complement to behavioral and content signals, and demonstrate a practical role for MLLMs in scaling sparse human explanations into preference information that improves industrial recommendation.

cs.IR↗