Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.28092

On centered local $π$-bases

Abstract

In 1967 Hajnal and Juh{á}sz showed that the cardinality of a first-countable Hausdorff space with the countable chain condition has cardinality at most $\mathfrak{c}$, the cardinality of the real line. We give an improvement of this celebrated theorem by replacing ``first-countable" with the weaker condition ``each point has a countable centered local $π$-base". Given a point $p$ in a topological space $X$, a \emph{local} $π$-\emph{base} $\scr{B}$ at $p$ acts like a neighborhood base at $p$ except that $p$ may not be in any member of $\scr{B}$. A local $π$-base $\scr{B}$ has the \emph{finite intersection property} if any finite intersection of members of $\scr{B}$ is nonempty. We call this type of local $π$-base \emph{centered}. A centered local $π$-base behaves even more like a neighborhood base in a sense. A space has the \emph{countable chain condition} if every family of pairwise disjoint open sets is countable. We also improve a theorem of Pospi{\v s}il from 1937 using centered local $π$-bases. As is customary, examples are given to demonstrate these improvements are strict. Compact Hausdorff spaces are also explored in this connection, along with variations on the notion of a centered local $π$-base.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nathan Carlson. 2026-04-30. On centered local $π$-bases. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28092

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sobriety of Scott topologies under countability conditions

In this paper, we focus on the sobriety of the Scott topology in countable case. Specifically, we show that: (1) every meet-continuous core-compact countable dcpo is sober with respect to the Scott topology; (2)every countable locally compact dcpo is sober endowed with the Scott topology; (3) the lattice of all open sets for the rational numbers space Q equipped with the Scott topology is not sober.

math.GN

Exponentiable Objects and Function spaces in Lowen Fuzzy Topological Spaces

We study exponentiable objects and function spaces in the category of stratified Lowen fuzzy topological spaces over \(\I=[0,1]\). Using the Lowen fuzzy Sierpiński object \(\Sier\), which identifies \(τ_X\) with \(C(X,\Sier)\), we explicitly determine the largest splitting topology on this mapping set. Its open weights \(Φ:τ_X\to\I\) are precisely those satisfying Scott continuity and a finite-tier compatibility condition induced by finite powers of \(\Sier\). This yields an intrinsic characterization: \(X\) is exponentiable if and only if every \(μ\inτ_X\) satisfies \[ μ=\bigvee_{λ\triangleleftΦ} (\const{Φ(μ)}\wedgeλ), \qquad λ\triangleleftΦ \Longleftrightarrow \const{Φ(ν)}\wedgeλ\leqν \quad(ν\inτ_X). \] When this condition holds, \(Y^X\) has underlying set \(C(X,Y)\), with topology generated by \([Φ,v](f)=Φ(v\circ f)\). We also obtain a dual closed-set formulation and three applications. Exponentiability implies that \(τ_X\) is a continuous lattice, although the converse fails. Moreover, a classical space \(X\) is exponentiable exactly when its induced fuzzy space \(ωX\) is exponentiable in the entire stratified Lowen category. Finally, Lowen compact, strongly fuzzy compact, and \(N\)-compact Hausdorff spaces are exponentiable.

math.GN

Super calibers in topological spaces and topological hyperspaces

We study the notion of a super caliber of a topological space, which is closely related to the classical notion of caliber and has appeared in the literature under several different names. We collect and unify several known results and establish new results concerning the collections of super calibers of topological spaces and their hyperspaces. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the super calibers of a space $X$ and those of hyperspaces $\mathcal{H}(X)$ lying between $\mathrm{CL}(X)$ and $\mathcal{F}(X)$. For infinite metrizable spaces, we characterize several cases in which $\mathsf{SC}(X)$ and $\mathsf{SC}(\mathrm{CL}(X))$ differ and establish an independence result over \textsf{ZFC}; see Theorem~5.12.

math.GN