Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.01594

Estimation of BLP models with high-dimensional controls

Abstract

This study proposes a framework for estimating demand in differentiated product markets with high dimensional product characteristics, building upon the seminal Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995) model, using market level data. We allow for a very large set of potential product characteristics, where the number of characteristics may exceed the number of market observations. Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish a general estimation theory for BLP models featuring high-dimensional nuisance parameters. We propose a Neyman orthogonal estimator specifically adapted to this framework, utilizing machine learning techniques, such as Lasso, to construct nuisance parameter estimators that are plugged into the Neyman orthogonal estimator. This approach offers a significant advantage: it achieves $\sqrt{T}$-asymptotic normality for parameters of interest--such as the price coefficient and price heterogeneity--even when nuisance parameters are estimated at slower rates due to their high dimensionality. Second, we apply this theory to a specialized BLP model under approximate sparsity, developing an estimation strategy for the high-dimensional nuisance parameters. The approximate sparsity condition posits that nuisance parameters can be controlled, up to a small approximation error, by a small and unknown subset of variables. In an economic context, this implies that while products have a vast array of characteristics, consumers focus on only a small subset of these due to bounded rationality. This condition makes the recovery of parameters of interest feasible by enabling nuisance parameter estimators to converge at the required rates. The practical performance of the method is evaluated through comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations, which demonstrate its efficacy in finite samples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hua Jin. 2026-05-02. Estimation of BLP models with high-dimensional controls. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Difference-in-Differences with Unpoolable Data

Difference-in-differences (DID) is commonly used to estimate treatment effects but is infeasible in settings where data are unpoolable due to privacy concerns or legal restrictions on data sharing, particularly across jurisdictions. In this study, we identify and relax the assumption of data poolability in DID estimation. We propose an innovative approach to estimate DID with unpoolable data (UN-DID) which can accommodate covariates, multiple groups, and staggered adoption. Through analytical proofs and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that UN-DID and conventional DID estimates of the average treatment effect and standard errors are equal and unbiased in settings without covariates. With covariates, both methods produce estimates that are unbiased, equivalent, and converge to the true value. The estimates differ slightly but the statistical inference and substantive conclusions remain the same. Two empirical examples with real-world data further underscore UN-DID's utility. The UN-DID method allows the estimation of cross-jurisdictional treatment effects with unpoolable data, enabling better counterfactuals to be used and new research questions to be answered.

econ.EM

The Promise of Time-Series Foundation Models for Agricultural Forecasting: Evidence from Commodity Prices

Forecasting agricultural markets remains challenging due to nonlinear dynamics, structural breaks, and sparse data. A long-standing belief holds that simple time-series methods outperform more advanced alternatives. This paper provides the first systematic evidence that this belief no longer holds with modern time-series foundation models (TSFMs). Using USDA ERS monthly commodity price data from 1997-2025, we evaluate 17 forecasting approaches across four model classes, including traditional time-series, machine learning, deep learning, and five state-of-the-art TSFMs (Chronos, Chronos-2, TimesFM 2.5, Time-MoE, Moirai-2), and construct annual marketing year price predictions to compare with USDA's futures-based season-average price (SAP) forecasts. We show that zero-shot foundation models consistently outperform traditional time-series methods, machine learning, and deep learning architectures trained from scratch in both monthly and annual forecasting. Furthermore, foundation models remarkably outperform USDA's futures-based forecasts on three of four major commodities despite USDA's information advantage from forward-looking futures markets. Time-MoE delivers the largest accuracy gains, achieving 54.9% improvement on wheat and 18.5% improvement on corn relative to USDA ERS benchmarks on recent data (2017-2024 excluding COVID). These results point to a paradigm shift in agricultural forecasting.

econ.EM

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM